# Ramsey Theorems for Trees and a General 'Private Learning Implies Online Learning' Theorem

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.07765 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.07765/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 16 of its 60 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Private PAC learning implies finite Littlestone dimension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.00949/) (2018)
- [A Characterization of Multiclass Learnability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.01550/) (2022)
- [An Equivalence Between Private Classification and Online Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.00563/) (2020)
- [Differentially Private Release and Learning of Threshold Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1504.07553/) (2015)
- [A Theory of PAC Learnability of Partial Concept Classes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.08444/) (2021)
- [Optimal PAC Bounds Without Uniform Convergence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.09167/) (2023)
- [Sample Complexity Bounds on Differentially Private Learning via Communication Complexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1402.6278/) (2014)
- [Privately Learning Thresholds: Closing the Exponential Gap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.10137/) (2019)
- [Characterizing the Sample Complexity of Private Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1402.2224/) (2014)
- [Multiclass Learnability Beyond the PAC Framework: Universal Rates and Partial Concept Classes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02297/) (2022)
- [A Trichotomy for Transductive Online Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.06428/) (2023)
- [On the Equivalence between Online and Private Learnability beyond Binary Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.01980/) (2020)
- [Multiclass Learnability Does Not Imply Sample Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.06424/) (2023)
- [Online Learning and Disambiguations of Partial Concept Classes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17578/) (2023)
- [A Unified Characterization of Private Learnability via Graph Theory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03996/) (2023)
- [Multiclass versus Binary Differentially Private PAC Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.10870/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Borsuk-Ulam and Replicable Learning of Large-Margin Halfspaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.15294/) (2025)
- [Private Learning of Littlestone Classes, Revisited](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00076/) (2025)
- [Differentially Private Language Generation and Identification in the Limit](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.08504/) (2026)
- [Beyond Worst-Case Online Classification: VC-Based Regret Bounds for Relaxed Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10598/) (2025)
- [Private List Learnability vs. Online List Learnability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12856/) (2025)
- [Learning from Equivalence Queries, Revisited](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.04535/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This work continues to investigate the link between differentially private (DP) and online learning. Alon, Livni, Malliaris, and Moran (2019) showed that for binary concept classes, DP learnability of a given class implies that it has a finite Littlestone dimension (equivalently, that it is online learnable). Their proof relies on a model-theoretic result by Hodges (1997), which demonstrates that any binary concept class with a large Littlestone dimension contains a large subclass of thresholds. In a follow-up work, Jung, Kim, and Tewari (2020) extended this proof to multiclass PAC learning with a bounded number of labels. Unfortunately, Hodges's result does not apply in other natural settings such as multiclass PAC learning with an unbounded label space, and PAC learning of partial concept classes. This naturally raises the question of whether DP learnability continues to imply online learnability in more general scenarios: indeed, Alon, Hanneke, Holzman, and Moran (2021) explicitly leave it as an open question in the context of partial concept classes, and the same question is open in the general multiclass setting. In this work, we give a positive answer to these questions showing that for general classification tasks, DP learnability implies online learnability. Our proof reasons directly about Littlestone trees, without relying on thresholds. We achieve this by establishing several Ramsey-type theorems for trees, which might be of independent interest.
