# DebUnc: Improving Large Language Model Agent Communication With Uncertainty Metrics

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06426 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.06426/

## Key facts

- Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 33 of its 47 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Social simulation and multi-agent debate](https://mlsanity.com/agents/social-simulation-and-multi-agent-debate/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 33)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08155/) (2023)
- [Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05221/) (2022)
- [MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00352/) (2023)
- [Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14325/) (2023)
- [Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.19118/) (2023)
- [Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13063/) (2023)
- [Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14975/) (2023)
- [Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Words](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14334/) (2022)
- [ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07201/) (2023)
- [Mitigating Hallucination in Large Multi-Modal Models via Robust Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.14565/) (2023)
- [A Survey of Hallucination in Large Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.05922/) (2023)
- [ReConcile: Round-Table Conference Improves Reasoning via Consensus among Diverse LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13007/) (2023)
- [Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology View](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02124/) (2023)
- [Unsupervised Quality Estimation for Neural Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.10608/) (2020)
- [Don't Hallucinate, Abstain: Identifying LLM Knowledge Gaps via Multi-LLM Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00367/) (2024)
- [LLM Lies: Hallucinations are not Bugs, but Features as Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01469/) (2023)
- [Fact-Checking the Output of Large Language Models via Token-Level Uncertainty Quantification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04696/) (2024)
- [LM-Polygraph: Uncertainty Estimation for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07383/) (2023)
- [To Believe or Not to Believe Your LLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.02543/) (2024)
- [SaySelf: Teaching LLMs to Express Confidence with Self-Reflective Rationales](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20974/) (2024)
- [Tell Your Model Where to Attend: Post-hoc Attention Steering for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.02262/) (2023)
- [LUQ: Long-text Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20279/) (2024)
- [Do LLMs Know about Hallucination? An Empirical Investigation of LLM's Hidden States](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09733/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [GAM-Agent: Game-Theoretic and Uncertainty-Aware Collaboration for Complex Visual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23399/) (2025)
- [GUARDIAN: Safeguarding LLM Multi-Agent Collaborations with Temporal Graph Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19234/) (2025)
- [OSC: Cognitive Orchestration through Dynamic Knowledge Alignment in Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.04876/) (2025)
- [Thought Communication in Multiagent Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.20733/) (2025)
- [Uncertainty Quantification in LLM Agents: Foundations, Emerging Challenges, and Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.05073/) (2026)
- [Demystifying Multi-Agent Debate: The Role of Confidence and Diversity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.19921/) (2026)
- [Multi-expert Prompting Improves Reliability, Safety, and Usefulness of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00492/) (2024)
- [Position: Towards a Responsible LLM-empowered Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01714/) (2025)
- [MV-Debate: Multi-view Agent Debate with Dynamic Reflection Gating for Multimodal Harmful Content Detection in Social Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05557/) (2025)
- [Uncertainty Propagation in LLM-Based Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.23505/) (2026)
- [When Embedding-Based Defenses Fail: Rethinking Safety in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.01133/) (2026)
- [Automated Data Enrichment using Confidence-Aware Fine-Grained Debate among Open-Source LLMs for Mental Health and Online Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.06227/) (2025)
- [Confidence Composition for Multiagent Language Model Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.13591/) (2026)
- [Semantic Uncertainty-Guided Orchestration in Hierarchical Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.14707/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-agent debates have been introduced to improve the accuracy of Large Language Models (LLMs) by having multiple agents discuss solutions to a problem over several rounds of debate. However, models often generate incorrect yet confident-sounding responses, which can mislead others. This issue arises partly because agents do not consider how confident their peers are. To address this, we propose DebUnc, a debate framework that uses uncertainty metrics to assess agent confidence. Confidence is then conveyed through a modified attention mechanism that adjusts token weights, or through textual prompts. Evaluations across benchmarks show that attention-based methods are particularly effective and that performance continues to improve as uncertainty estimation becomes more reliable. The code is available at https://github.com/lukeyoffe/debunc.