# Pistis-RAG: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Human Feedback

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.00072 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.00072/

## Key facts

- Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RAG pipeline design and evaluation, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation.
- Builds on 17 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2024.

## Placed in

- Retrieval-augmented generation / [RAG pipeline design and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/rag/rag-pipeline-design-and-evaluation/)
- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Preference alignment for recommenders and RAG](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/preference-alignment-for-recommenders-and-rag/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [Qwen Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16609/) (2023)
- [WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.09332/) (2021)
- [From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16130/) (2024)
- [Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.04426/) (2021)
- [Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08786/) (2021)
- [M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03216/) (2024)
- [C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08322/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Struggle to Learn Long-Tail Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.08411/) (2022)
- [Augmentation-Adapted Retriever Improves Generalization of Language Models as Generic Plug-In](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17331/) (2023)
- [Bridging the Preference Gap between Retrievers and LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06954/) (2024)
- [Improved Asymmetric Locality Sensitive Hashing (ALSH) for Maximum Inner Product Search (MIPS)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1410.5410/) (2014)

## Built on by (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [SymbioticRAG: Enhancing Document Intelligence Through Human-LLM Symbiotic Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.02418/) (2025)
- [From Deferral to Learning: Online In-Context Knowledge Distillation for LLM Cascades](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.22984/) (2025)
- [Optimizing Retrieval for RAG via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.24652/) (2025)
- [An Overview and Discussion on Using Large Language Models for Implementation Generation of Solutions to Open-Ended Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.00562/) (2024)
- [DMA: Online RAG Alignment with Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.04880/) (2025)
- [Deepchecks: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.14488/) (2026)
- [Feedback-Assisted Trust Propagation over Document Relation Graphs for Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.00543/) (2026)
- [Mapping the RAG Landscape: A Four Axis Taxonomy of Efficiency, Defense, Interactivity, and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.01936/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

RAG systems face limitations when semantic relevance alone does not guarantee improved generation quality. This issue becomes particularly evident due to the sensitivity of large language models (LLMs) to the ordering of few-shot prompts, which can affect model performance. To address this challenge, aligning LLM outputs with human preferences using structured feedback, such as options to copy, regenerate, or dislike, offers a promising method for improvement. This feedback is applied to the entire list of inputs rather than giving specific ratings for individual documents, making it a Listwide Labels Learning-to-Rank task. To address this task, we propose Pistis-RAG, a new RAG framework designed with a content-centric approach to better align LLMs with human preferences. Pistis-RAG effectively utilizes human feedback, enhancing content ranking and generation quality. To validate our framework, we use public datasets to simulate human feedback, allowing us to evaluate and refine our method effectively. Experimental results indicate that Pistis-RAG improves alignment with human preferences relative to the baseline RAG system, showing a 6.06% increase in MMLU (English) and a 7.08% increase in C-EVAL (Chinese) accuracy metrics. These results highlight Pistis-RAG's effectiveness in overcoming the limitations associated with traditional RAG approaches.