# AutoDetect: Towards a Unified Framework for Automated Weakness Detection in Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.16714 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16714/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 31 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10560/) (2022)
- [Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12712/) (2023)
- [Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.04615/) (2022)
- [Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08419/) (2023)
- [Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04132/) (2024)
- [Red Teaming Language Models with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03286/) (2022)
- [BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.04657/) (2023)
- [Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learned](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.07858/) (2022)
- [LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13076/) (2024)
- [Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandbox](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15817/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19736/) (2023)
- [Rethinking Benchmark and Contamination for Language Models with Rephrased Samples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.04850/) (2023)
- [Build it Break it Fix it for Dialogue Safety: Robustness from Adversarial Human Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.06083/) (2019)
- [Benchmarking Foundation Models with Language-Model-as-an-Examiner](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04181/) (2023)
- [Recipes for Safety in Open-domain Chatbots](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.07079/) (2020)
- [Black-Box Prompt Optimization: Aligning Large Language Models without Model Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.04155/) (2023)
- [Skywork: A More Open Bilingual Foundation Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19341/) (2023)
- [Benchmark Self-Evolving: A Multi-Agent Framework for Dynamic LLM Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11443/) (2024)
- [Towards Safer Generative Language Models: A Survey on Safety Risks, Evaluations, and Improvements](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.09270/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Toward Generalizable Evaluation in the LLM Era: A Survey Beyond Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.18838/) (2025)
- [SPaR: Self-Play with Tree-Search Refinement to Improve Instruction-Following in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11605/) (2024)
- [LogicGame: Benchmarking Rule-Based Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.15778/) (2024)
- [APT: Improving Specialist LLM Performance with Weakness Case Acquisition and Iterative Preference Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.03483/) (2025)
- [ProbeLLM: Automating Principled Diagnosis of LLM Failures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12966/) (2026)
- [The Superalignment of Superhuman Intelligence with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11145/) (2024)
- [Synthetic Data Generation for Phrase Break Prediction with Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.18044/) (2025)
- [Uncovering Competency Gaps in Large Language Models and Their Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.20638/) (2025)
- [LLM Post-Training as Brownfield Maintenance: An Industrial Perspective on Dataware Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.31102/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Although Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly powerful, they still exhibit significant but subtle weaknesses, such as mistakes in instruction-following or coding tasks. As these unexpected errors could lead to severe consequences in practical deployments, it is crucial to investigate the limitations within LLMs systematically. Traditional benchmarking approaches cannot thoroughly pinpoint specific model deficiencies, while manual inspections are costly and not scalable. In this paper, we introduce a unified framework, AutoDetect, to automatically expose weaknesses in LLMs across various tasks. Inspired by the educational assessment process that measures students' learning outcomes, AutoDetect consists of three LLM-powered agents: Examiner, Questioner, and Assessor. The collaboration among these three agents is designed to realize comprehensive and in-depth weakness identification. Our framework demonstrates significant success in uncovering flaws, with an identification success rate exceeding 30% in prominent models such as ChatGPT and Claude. More importantly, these identified weaknesses can guide specific model improvements, proving more effective than untargeted data augmentation methods like Self-Instruct. Our approach has led to substantial enhancements in popular LLMs, including the Llama series and Mistral-7b, boosting their performance by over 10% across several benchmarks. Code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/thu-coai/AutoDetect.