# Toward Fairer Face Recognition Datasets

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.16592 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16592/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 35 of its 58 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 35)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.03426/) (2018)
- [FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clustering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.03832/) (2015)
- [Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02413/) (2016)
- [BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.05100/) (2022)
- [Cascaded Diffusion Models for High Fidelity Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.15282/) (2021)
- [VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and age](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.08092/) (2017)
- [MS-Celeb-1M: A Dataset and Benchmark for Large-Scale Face Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.08221/) (2016)
- [Learning Face Representation from Scratch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.7923/) (2014)
- [Diffusion Art or Digital Forgery? Investigating Data Replication in Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.03860/) (2022)
- [AdaFace: Quality Adaptive Margin for Face Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.00964/) (2022)
- [Cross-Age LFW: A Database for Studying Cross-Age Face Recognition in Unconstrained Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.08197/) (2017)
- [WebFace260M: A Benchmark Unveiling the Power of Million-Scale Deep Face Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.04098/) (2021)
- [The MegaFace Benchmark: 1 Million Faces for Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.00596/) (2015)
- [Fake It Till You Make It: Face analysis in the wild using synthetic data alone](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.15102/) (2021)
- [Mitigate Bias in Face Recognition using Skewness-Aware Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.10692/) (2019)
- [DCFace: Synthetic Face Generation with Dual Condition Diffusion Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07060/) (2023)
- [SynFace: Face Recognition with Synthetic Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07960/) (2021)
- [DigiFace-1M: 1 Million Digital Face Images for Face Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02579/) (2022)
- [FairFace: Face Attribute Dataset for Balanced Race, Gender, and Age](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.04913/) (2019)
- [A Comprehensive Study on Face Recognition Biases Beyond Demographics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.01592/) (2021)
- [A Survey on Bias in Visual Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.07919/) (2021)
- [Face Recognition: Too Bias, or Not Too Bias?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.06483/) (2020)
- [6D Rotation Representation For Unconstrained Head Pose Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.12555/) (2022)
- [Meta Balanced Network for Fair Face Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.06548/) (2022)
- [Analyzing Bias in Diffusion-based Face Generation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06402/) (2023)
- [Attribute-preserving Face Dataset Anonymization via Latent Code Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11296/) (2023)
- [How Does Gender Balance In Training Data Affect Face Recognition Accuracy?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.02934/) (2020)
- [When do GANs replicate? On the choice of dataset size](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.11765/) (2022)
- [Gendered Differences in Face Recognition Accuracy Explained by Hairstyles, Makeup, and Facial Morphology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.14656/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Face recognition and verification are two computer vision tasks whose performance has progressed with the introduction of deep representations. However, ethical, legal, and technical challenges due to the sensitive character of face data and biases in real training datasets hinder their development. Generative AI addresses privacy by creating fictitious identities, but fairness problems persist. We promote fairness by introducing a demographic attributes balancing mechanism in generated training datasets. We experiment with an existing real dataset, three generated training datasets, and the balanced versions of a diffusion-based dataset. We propose a comprehensive evaluation that considers accuracy and fairness equally and includes a rigorous regression-based statistical analysis of attributes. The analysis shows that balancing reduces demographic unfairness. Also, a performance gap persists despite generation becoming more accurate with time. The proposed balancing method and comprehensive verification evaluation promote fairer and transparent face recognition and verification.
