# Understanding Student and Academic Staff Perceptions of AI Use in Assessment and Feedback

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15808 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15808/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02819/) (2023)
- [Testing of Detection Tools for AI-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15666/) (2023)
- [A Comprehensive AI Policy Education Framework for University Teaching and Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.00280/) (2023)
- [Game of Tones: Faculty detection of GPT-4 generated content in university assessments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18081/) (2023)
- [GenAI Detection Tools, Adversarial Techniques and Implications for Inclusivity in Higher Education](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.19148/) (2024)
- [The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and Millennial Generation teachers?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02878/) (2023)
- [The AI Assessment Scale (AIAS): A Framework for Ethical Integration of Generative AI in Educational Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.07086/) (2023)
- [Generative AI in Education: A Study of Educators' Awareness, Sentiments, and Influencing Factors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.15586/) (2024)
- [The AI Assessment Scale (AIAS) in action: A pilot implementation of GenAI supported assessment- A Preprint](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14692/) (2024)
- [Deconstructing Student Perceptions of Generative AI (GenAI) through an Expectancy Value Theory (EVT)-based Instrument](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01186/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Generative AI and Agency in Education: A Critical Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00631/) (2024)
- [The EAP-AIAS: Adapting the AI Assessment Scale for English for Academic Purposes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.01075/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in higher education necessitates assessment reform. This study addresses a critical gap by exploring student and academic staff experiences with AI and GenAI tools, focusing on their familiarity and comfort with current and potential future applications in learning and assessment. An online survey collected data from 35 academic staff and 282 students across two universities in Vietnam and one in Singapore, examining GenAI familiarity, perceptions of its use in assessment marking and feedback, knowledge checking and participation, and experiences of GenAI text detection. Descriptive statistics and reflexive thematic analysis revealed a generally low familiarity with GenAI among both groups. GenAI feedback was viewed negatively; however, it was viewed more positively when combined with instructor feedback. Academic staff were more accepting of GenAI text detection tools and grade adjustments based on detection results compared to students. Qualitative analysis identified three themes: unclear understanding of text detection tools, variability in experiences with GenAI detectors, and mixed feelings about GenAI's future impact on educational assessment. These findings have major implications regarding the development of policies and practices for GenAI-enabled assessment and feedback in higher education.