# Detecting AI-Generated Text: Factors Influencing Detectability with Current Methods

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15583 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15583/

## Key facts

- Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 88 of its 118 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 88)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01652/) (2021)
- [Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05150/) (2020)
- [DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.11305/) (2023)
- [A Watermark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.10226/) (2023)
- [Defending Against Neural Fake News](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12616/) (2019)
- [Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09203/) (2019)
- [GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.04043/) (2019)
- [How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.07597/) (2023)
- [MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.01454/) (2021)
- [Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defense](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13408/) (2023)
- [Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11156/) (2023)
- [Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15593/) (2023)
- [Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17439/) (2023)
- [Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05130/) (2023)
- [Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12070/) (2024)
- [Undetectable Watermarks for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09194/) (2023)
- [DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05540/) (2023)
- [RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03838/) (2023)
- [GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02819/) (2023)
- [Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13788/) (2023)
- [RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.07940/) (2024)
- [MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13242/) (2023)
- [DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17359/) (2023)
- [The Science of Detecting LLM-Generated Texts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.07205/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [Are We in the AI-Generated Text World Already? Quantifying and Monitoring AIGT on Social Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.18148/) (2024)
- [A Practical Examination of AI-Generated Text Detectors for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05139/) (2024)
- [Detecting Stylistic Fingerprints of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01659/) (2025)
- [Linguistic and Embedding-Based Profiling of Texts generated by Humans and Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.13614/) (2025)
- [The Impact of AI-Generated Text on the Internet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.26965/) (2026)
- [When Detection Fails: The Power of Fine-Tuned Models to Generate Human-Like Social Media Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09975/) (2025)
- [HULLMI: Human vs LLM identification with explainability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.04808/) (2024)
- [Explainability-Based Token Replacement on LLM-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04050/) (2025)
- [On the Detectability of LLM-Generated Text: What Exactly Is LLM-Generated Text?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.20810/) (2025)
- [Uncertainty in Authorship: Why Perfect AI Detection Is Mathematically Impossible](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.11915/) (2025)
- [Advancing Machine-Generated Text Detection from an Easy to Hard Supervision Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.00988/) (2025)
- [Beyond Raw Detection Scores: Markov-Informed Calibration for Boosting Machine-Generated Text Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08031/) (2026)
- [Exploring AI Text Generation, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, and Detection Technologies: a Comprehensive Overview](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.03933/) (2024)
- [Unmask It! AI-Generated Product Review Detection in Dravidian Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09289/) (2025)
- [If generative AI is the answer, what is the question?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.06120/) (2025)
- [SENTRA: Selected-Next-Token Transformer for LLM Text Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.12385/) (2025)
- [Semantic Reconstruction of Adversarial Plagiarism: A Context-Aware Framework for Detecting and Restoring "Tortured Phrases" in Scientific Literature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.10435/) (2025)
- [Beyond A Fixed Seal: Adaptive Stealing Watermark in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.10893/) (2026)
- [Hidden Human-Like Nature of Machine-Generated Texts: Theory and Detection Enhancement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.23190/) (2026)
- [From Context Shift to Stylistic Collapse: Why Training Objectives Matter More Than Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.28826/) (2026)
- [DWT-Fusion: A Signal-Based Framework for Training-Free LLM-Generated Text Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.22026/) (2026)
- [Style as a Confound: False Positives in AI Detection of Non-Native Academic Writing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.26710/) (2026)
- [LA-CPD: Local-Evidence-Aware Change-Point Detection for Human-LLM Authorship Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.33787/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have advanced to a point that even humans have difficulty discerning whether a text was generated by another human, or by a computer. However, knowing whether a text was produced by human or artificial intelligence (AI) is important to determining its trustworthiness, and has applications in many domains including detecting fraud and academic dishonesty, as well as combating the spread of misinformation and political propaganda. The task of AI-generated text (AIGT) detection is therefore both very challenging, and highly critical. In this survey, we summarize state-of-the art approaches to AIGT detection, including watermarking, statistical and stylistic analysis, and machine learning classification. We also provide information about existing datasets for this task. Synthesizing the research findings, we aim to provide insight into the salient factors that combine to determine how "detectable" AIGT text is under different scenarios, and to make practical recommendations for future work towards this significant technical and societal challenge.