# MoreHopQA: More Than Multi-hop Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13397 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13397/

## Key facts

- Cited by 37 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 23 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/knowledge-and-tool-augmented-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07780/) (2020)
- [Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Steps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.01060/) (2020)
- [Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03350/) (2022)
- [Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08295/) (2024)
- [Decomposed Prompting: A Modular Approach for Solving Complex Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02406/) (2022)
- [The Web as a Knowledge-base for Answering Complex Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.06643/) (2018)
- [MQuAKE: Assessing Knowledge Editing in Language Models via Multi-Hop Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14795/) (2023)
- [Reasoning with Language Model Prompting: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09597/) (2022)
- [Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.06481/) (2017)
- [Multi-hop Reading Comprehension through Question Decomposition and Rescoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02916/) (2019)
- [Successive Prompting for Decomposing Complex Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04092/) (2022)
- [Compositional Questions Do Not Necessitate Multi-hop Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02900/) (2019)
- [Avoiding Reasoning Shortcuts: Adversarial Evaluation, Training, and Model Development for Multi-Hop QA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.07132/) (2019)
- [What Makes Reading Comprehension Questions Easier?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.09384/) (2018)
- [Understanding Dataset Design Choices for Multi-hop Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.12106/) (2019)
- [Is a Question Decomposition Unit All We Need?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12538/) (2022)
- [R4C: A Benchmark for Evaluating RC Systems to Get the Right Answer for the Right Reason](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.04601/) (2019)
- [Decomposing Complex Questions Makes Multi-Hop QA Easier and More Interpretable](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.13472/) (2021)
- [Do Multi-Hop Question Answering Systems Know How to Answer the Single-Hop Sub-Questions?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.09919/) (2020)
- [Cofca: A Step-Wise Counterfactual Multi-hop QA benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11924/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 37)

- [Fact, Fetch, and Reason: A Unified Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12941/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Step-by-step Reasoning Traces: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12289/) (2025)
- [A Survey of LLM-based Deep Search Agents: Paradigm, Optimization, Evaluation, and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05668/) (2025)
- [ToolHop: A Query-Driven Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Hop Tool Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.02506/) (2025)
- [Roll the dice & look before you leap: Going beyond the creative limits of next-token prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.15266/) (2025)
- [Explicit v.s. Implicit Memory: Exploring Multi-hop Complex Reasoning Over Personalized Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.13250/) (2025)
- [Adaptive Graph of Thoughts: Test-Time Adaptive Reasoning Unifying Chain, Tree, and Graph Structures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05078/) (2025)
- [Locret: Enhancing Eviction in Long-Context LLM Inference with Trained Retaining Heads on Consumer-Grade Devices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.01805/) (2024)
- [DynaSearcher: Dynamic Knowledge Graph Augmented Search Agent via Multi-Reward Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.17365/) (2025)
- [BioHopR: A Benchmark for Multi-Hop, Multi-Answer Reasoning in Biomedical Domain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22240/) (2025)
- [NeedleInATable: Exploring Long-Context Capability of Large Language Models towards Long-Structured Tables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.06560/) (2025)
- [Every Response Counts: Quantifying Uncertainty of LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems through Tensor Decomposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.08708/) (2026)
- [Graph-KV: Breaking Sequence via Injecting Structural Biases into Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07334/) (2025)
- [AgenticRAGTracer: A Hop-Aware Benchmark for Diagnosing Multi-Step Retrieval Reasoning in Agentic RAG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.19127/) (2026)
- [MDBench: A Synthetic Multi-Document Reasoning Benchmark Generated with Knowledge Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.14927/) (2025)
- [Explaining the Reasoning of Large Language Models Using Attribution Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.15663/) (2025)
- [Failure Modes in Multi-Hop QA: The Weakest Link Effect and the Recognition Bottleneck](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.12499/) (2026)
- [LogiPlan: A Structured Benchmark for Logical Planning and Relational Reasoning in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.10527/) (2025)
- [PAR2-RAG: Planned Active Retrieval and Reasoning for Multi-Hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.29085/) (2026)
- [Diagnosing Multi-step Reasoning Failures in Black-box LLMs via Stepwise Confidence Attribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.19228/) (2026)
- [Benchmarking Chinese Commonsense Reasoning with a Multi-hop Reasoning Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.08800/) (2025)
- [Kinship Data Benchmark for Multi-hop Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.07794/) (2026)
- [MiRAGE: A Multiagent Framework for Generating Multimodal Multihop Question-Answer Dataset for RAG Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.15487/) (2026)
- [Positional versus Symbolic Attention Heads: Learning Dynamics, RoPE Geometry, and Length Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.31558/) (2026)
- [CRiT-QA: Evaluating Multi-hop Reasoning with Counterfactual Chains and Distractor Traps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.10562/) (2026)
- [IterCOMP: Reasoning-aware Adaptive Prompt Compression for Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.13588/) (2026)
- [More Correct Mass, Worse Answers: Why Power Sampling Can Fail and How to Fix It](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.14420/) (2026)
- [MRCEval: A Comprehensive, Challenging and Accessible Machine Reading Comprehension Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07144/) (2025)
- [RouteGoT: Node-Adaptive Routing for Cost-Efficient Graph of Thoughts Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.05818/) (2026)
- [Omanic: Towards Step-wise Evaluation of Multi-hop Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.16654/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Most existing multi-hop datasets are extractive answer datasets, where the answers to the questions can be extracted directly from the provided context. This often leads models to use heuristics or shortcuts instead of performing true multi-hop reasoning. In this paper, we propose a new multi-hop dataset, MoreHopQA, which shifts from extractive to generative answers. Our dataset is created by utilizing three existing multi-hop datasets: HotpotQA, 2WikiMultihopQA, and MuSiQue. Instead of relying solely on factual reasoning, we enhance the existing multi-hop questions by adding another layer of questioning that involves one, two, or all three of the following types of reasoning: commonsense, arithmetic, and symbolic. Our dataset is created through a semi-automated process, resulting in a dataset with 1,118 samples that have undergone human verification. We then use our dataset to evaluate five different large language models: Mistral 7B, Gemma 7B, Llama 3 (8B and 70B), and GPT-4. We also design various cases to analyze the reasoning steps in the question-answering process. Our results show that models perform well on initial multi-hop questions but struggle with our extended questions, indicating that our dataset is more challenging than previous ones. Our analysis of question decomposition reveals that although models can correctly answer questions, only a portion - 38.7% for GPT-4 and 33.4% for Llama3-70B - achieve perfect reasoning, where all corresponding sub-questions are answered correctly. Evaluation code and data are available at https://github.com/Alab-NII/morehopqa