# JavaBench: A Benchmark of Object-Oriented Code Generation for Evaluating Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.12902 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12902/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 34 of its 63 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 34)

- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03172/) (2023)
- [The Curious Case of Neural Text Degeneration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09751/) (2019)
- [Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.13586/) (2021)
- [Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12950/) (2023)
- [Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.04615/) (2022)
- [Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01210/) (2023)
- [CodeBERT: A Pre-Trained Model for Programming and Natural Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08155/) (2020)
- [CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00859/) (2021)
- [Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.09938/) (2021)
- [CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.13474/) (2022)
- [WizardCoder: Empowering Code Large Language Models with Evol-Instruct](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08568/) (2023)
- [MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalisms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13319/) (2019)
- [DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.02954/) (2024)
- [DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.11501/) (2022)
- [RepoCoder: Repository-Level Code Completion Through Iterative Retrieval and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12570/) (2023)
- [CodeGeeX: A Pre-Trained Model for Code Generation with Multilingual Benchmarking on HumanEval-X](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17568/) (2023)
- [CRUXEval: A Benchmark for Code Reasoning, Understanding and Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03065/) (2024)
- [An Empirical Evaluation of Using Large Language Models for Automated Unit Test Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06527/) (2023)
- [CrossCodeEval: A Diverse and Multilingual Benchmark for Cross-File Code Completion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11248/) (2023)
- [Time Travel in LLMs: Tracing Data Contamination in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08493/) (2023)
- [ClassEval: A Manually-Crafted Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Class-level Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01861/) (2023)
- [Learning to Mine Aligned Code and Natural Language Pairs from Stack Overflow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.08949/) (2018)
- [Large Language Models Meet NL2Code: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09420/) (2022)
- [Repository-Level Prompt Generation for Large Language Models of Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.12839/) (2022)
- [Mapping Language to Code in Programmatic Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.09588/) (2018)
- [Execution-Based Evaluation for Open-Domain Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10481/) (2022)
- [CERT: Continual Pre-Training on Sketches for Library-Oriented Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.06888/) (2022)
- [DevEval: A Manually-Annotated Code Generation Benchmark Aligned with Real-World Code Repositories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19856/) (2024)
- [Dataflow-Guided Retrieval Augmentation for Repository-Level Code Completion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19782/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [CRUXEval-X: A Benchmark for Multilingual Code Reasoning, Understanding and Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.13001/) (2024)
- [From Code Foundation Models to Agents and Applications: A Comprehensive Survey and Practical Guide to Code Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.18538/) (2025)
- [LLM Benchmarking with LLaMA2: Evaluating Code Development Performance Across Multiple Programming Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19217/) (2025)
- [Benchmarking AI Models in Software Engineering: A Review, Search Tool, and Unified Approach for Elevating Benchmark Quality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.05860/) (2025)
- [AdaptEval: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Code Snippet Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.04540/) (2026)
- [Benchmarking Large Language Models for ABAP Code Generation: An Empirical Study on Iterative Improvement by Compiler Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.15188/) (2026)
- [SwiftEval: Developing a Language-Specific Benchmark for LLM-generated Code Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24324/) (2025)
- [CrossPL: Evaluating Large Language Models on Cross Programming Language Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.19904/) (2025)
- [MobileDev-Bench: A Benchmark for Issue Resolution in Mobile Application Development](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.24946/) (2026)
- [Do Uncertainty Signals Help? A Systematic Study of Uncertainty-Aware Decoding with Rollback Mechanisms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.14653/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Code generation benchmarks such as HumanEval are widely adopted to evaluate LLMs' capabilities. However, after consolidating the latest 24 benchmarks, we noticed three significant imbalances. First, imbalanced programming language. 95.8% of benchmarks involve Python, while only 5 benchmarks involve Java. Second, imbalanced code granularity. Function-/statement-level benchmarks account for over 83.3% of benchmarks. Only a mere handful extends to class-/project-levels, and all are limited to Python. Third, lacking advanced features. Existing benchmarks primarily assess basic coding skills, while overlooking advanced Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) features (i.e., encapsulation, inheritance, and polymorphism). To fill these gaps, we propose JavaBench, a project-level Java benchmark that exercises OOP features. It comprises four Java projects with 389 methods in 106 Java classes. The test coverage is up to 92%, and JavaBench is attested by 282 undergraduate students, reaching a 90.93/100 average score (i.e., pass rate against the test suite), ensuring the quality of documentation, code skeleton, and tests. To better evaluate LLM's capability against JavaBench, we introduce a systematic evaluation design covering three context settings and five synthesis strategies at two granularities using three hierarchical metrics. Our extensive experiment yields several interesting findings. First, we noticed that regarding project-level Java programming, LLMs are far behind undergraduate students (no project can be correctly completed by any studied LLMs, and at most 41.17% Pass@5 in a more relaxed evaluation). Second, using method signature as prompt context may strike an ideal balance for project-level code generation. JavaBench is publicly available at https://github.com/java-bench/JavaBench.