# Fine-Tuning or Fine-Failing? Debunking Performance Myths in Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11201 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11201/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RAG pipeline design and evaluation, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation.
- Builds on 15 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2024.

## Placed in

- Retrieval-augmented generation / [RAG pipeline design and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/rag/rag-pipeline-design-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16634/) (2023)
- [BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.08746/) (2019)
- [Mixtral of Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04088/) (2024)
- [Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13712/) (2023)
- [FinBERT: Financial Sentiment Analysis with Pre-trained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10063/) (2019)
- [TALLRec: An Effective and Efficient Tuning Framework to Align Large Language Model with Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.00447/) (2023)
- [FinGPT: Open-Source Financial Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.06031/) (2023)
- [LLM Lies: Hallucinations are not Bugs, but Features as Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01469/) (2023)
- [Seven Failure Points When Engineering a Retrieval Augmented Generation System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05856/) (2024)
- [A Survey of GPT-3 Family Large Language Models Including ChatGPT and GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12321/) (2023)
- [A Brief Report on LawGPT 1.0: A Virtual Legal Assistant Based on GPT-3](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.05729/) (2023)
- [ChatGPT: Beginning of an End of Manual Linguistic Data Annotation? Use Case of Automatic Genre Identification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03953/) (2023)
- [Enhancing Large Language Model Performance To Answer Questions and Extract Information More Accurately](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01722/) (2024)
- [Zero is Not Hero Yet: Benchmarking Zero-Shot Performance of LLMs for Financial Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16633/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [HalluRNN: Mitigating Hallucinations via Recurrent Cross-Layer Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.17587/) (2025)
- [Inference-Time Distillation: Cost-Efficient Agents Without Fine-Tuning or Manual Prompt Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.02543/) (2025)
- [Is Exchangeability better than I.I.D to handle Data Distribution Shifts while Pooling Data for Data-scarce Medical image segmentation?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.19575/) (2025)
- [TuneAhead: Predicting Fine-tuning Performance Before Full Training Begins](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.17660/) (2026)
- [From Words to Wisdom: Discourse Annotation and Baseline Models for Student Dialogue Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.20547/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have the unique capability to understand and generate human-like text from input queries. When fine-tuned, these models show enhanced performance on domain-specific queries. OpenAI highlights the process of fine-tuning, stating: "To fine-tune a model, you are required to provide at least 10 examples. We typically see clear improvements from fine-tuning on 50 to 100 training examples, but the right number varies greatly based on the exact use case." This study extends this concept to the integration of LLMs within Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines, which aim to improve accuracy and relevance by leveraging external corpus data for information retrieval. However, RAG's promise of delivering optimal responses often falls short in complex query scenarios. This study aims to specifically examine the effects of fine-tuning LLMs on their ability to extract and integrate contextual data to enhance the performance of RAG systems across multiple domains. We evaluate the impact of fine-tuning on the LLMs' capacity for data extraction and contextual understanding by comparing the accuracy and completeness of fine-tuned models against baseline performances across datasets from multiple domains. Our findings indicate that fine-tuning resulted in a decline in performance compared to the baseline models, contrary to the improvements observed in standalone LLM applications as suggested by OpenAI. This study highlights the need for vigorous investigation and validation of fine-tuned models for domain-specific tasks.