# A Survey on Human Preference Learning for Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11191 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11191/

## Key facts

- Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 140 of its 198 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Human values and AI feedback alignment](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/human-values-and-ai-feedback-alignment/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 140)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08485/) (2023)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0473/) (2014)
- [Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1301.3781/) (2013)
- [On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07258/) (2021)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)
- [Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1310.4546/) (2013)
- [Qwen Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16609/) (2023)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.3215/) (2014)
- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06500/) (2023)
- [Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10560/) (2022)
- [A Survey of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.18223/) (2023)
- [Deep contextualized word representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.05365/) (2018)

## Built on by (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Internal Consistency and Self-Feedback in Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.14507/) (2024)
- [A Survey of Direct Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.11701/) (2025)
- [Doing More with Less: A Survey on Routing Strategies for Resource Optimisation in Large Language Model-Based Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.00409/) (2025)
- [Towards a Unified View of Preference Learning for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.02795/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Progress in LLM Alignment from the Perspective of Reward Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.02666/) (2025)
- [Bridging Relevance and Reasoning: Rationale Distillation in Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.08519/) (2024)
- [Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning with Reward Models: An Analytical Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.01925/) (2025)
- [Multi-level Value Alignment in Agentic AI Systems: Survey and Perspectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09656/) (2025)
- [Goal Inference from Open-Ended Dialog](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13957/) (2024)
- [Fine-tuning Large Language Models with Limited Data: A Survey and Practical Guide](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.09539/) (2024)
- [Seeing Beyond the Scene: Enhancing Vision-Language Models with Interactional Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09118/) (2025)
- [Can LLMs Make (Personalized) Access Control Decisions?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.20284/) (2025)
- [RuleAlign: Making Large Language Models Better Physicians with Diagnostic Rule Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.12579/) (2024)
- [Preference learning made easy: Everything should be understood through win rate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.10505/) (2025)
- [Towards Cognitively-Faithful Decision-Making Models to Improve AI Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.04445/) (2025)
- [VickreyFeedback: Cost-efficient Data Construction for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.18417/) (2024)
- [Listwise Preference Alignment Optimization for Tail Item Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.02255/) (2025)
- [SAMPO-Path: Segmentation Intent-Aligned Preference Optimization for Pathology Foundation Model Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.02464/) (2025)
- [Data Metabolism: An Efficient Data Design Schema For Vision Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.12316/) (2025)
- [Preference Learning with Response Time: Robust Losses and Guarantees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22820/) (2025)
- [References Indeed Matter? Reference-Free Preference Optimization for Conversational Query Reformulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.06552/) (2025)
- [Beyond Token-Level Policy Gradients for Complex Reasoning with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.14386/) (2026)
- [Internal Pluralism and the Limits of Pairwise Comparisons](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.02672/) (2026)
- [An Investigation of Translationese in the Generations of Multilingual Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.17399/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The recent surge of versatile large language models (LLMs) largely depends on aligning increasingly capable foundation models with human intentions by preference learning, enhancing LLMs with excellent applicability and effectiveness in a wide range of contexts. Despite the numerous related studies conducted, a perspective on how human preferences are introduced into LLMs remains limited, which may prevent a deeper comprehension of the relationships between human preferences and LLMs as well as the realization of their limitations. In this survey, we review the progress in exploring human preference learning for LLMs from a preference-centered perspective, covering the sources and formats of preference feedback, the modeling and usage of preference signals, as well as the evaluation of the aligned LLMs. We first categorize the human feedback according to data sources and formats. We then summarize techniques for human preferences modeling and compare the advantages and disadvantages of different schools of models. Moreover, we present various preference usage methods sorted by the objectives to utilize human preference signals. Finally, we summarize some prevailing approaches to evaluate LLMs in terms of alignment with human intentions and discuss our outlooks on the human intention alignment for LLMs.