# RWKU: Benchmarking Real-World Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.10890 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10890/

## Key facts

- Cited by 78 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 50 of its 73 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Machine unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/safety/machine-unlearning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 50)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07830/) (2019)
- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.03551/) (2017)
- [Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05262/) (2022)
- [Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.07805/) (2020)
- [Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09261/) (2022)
- [Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01405/) (2023)
- [When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10511/) (2022)
- [Editing Models with Task Arithmetic](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04089/) (2022)
- [Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.03817/) (2019)
- [Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.04933/) (2019)
- [TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06121/) (2024)
- [Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14767/) (2023)
- [Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05868/) (2024)
- [Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01504/) (2022)
- [Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16789/) (2023)
- [Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02238/) (2023)
- [Large Language Model Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10683/) (2023)
- [Physics of Language Models: Part 3.1, Knowledge Storage and Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.14316/) (2023)
- [Towards Unbounded Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.09880/) (2023)
- [LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed form](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03819/) (2023)
- [Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.08787/) (2024)
- [Quark: Controllable Text Generation with Reinforced Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.13636/) (2022)
- [In-Context Unlearning: Language Models as Few Shot Unlearners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07579/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 78)

- [An Adversarial Perspective on Machine Unlearning for AI Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.18025/) (2024)
- [Unlearning or Obfuscating? Jogging the Memory of Unlearned LLMs via Benign Relearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13356/) (2024)
- [OpenUnlearning: Accelerating LLM Unlearning via Unified Benchmarking of Methods and Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12618/) (2025)
- [Catastrophic Failure of LLM Unlearning via Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16454/) (2024)
- [Position: LLM Unlearning Benchmarks are Weak Measures of Progress](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02879/) (2024)
- [A Closer Look at Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.08109/) (2024)
- [A Comprehensive Survey of Machine Unlearning Techniques for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01854/) (2025)
- [Tool Unlearning for Tool-Augmented LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01083/) (2025)
- [BLUR: A Benchmark for LLM Unlearning Robust to Forget-Retain Overlap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.15699/) (2025)
- [Exact Unlearning of Finetuning Data via Model Merging at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.04626/) (2025)
- [Do LLMs Really Forget? Evaluating Unlearning with Knowledge Correlation and Confidence Awareness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05735/) (2025)
- [Advancing Language Multi-Agent Learning with Credit Re-Assignment for Interactive Environment Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14496/) (2025)
- [MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence Calibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23224/) (2025)
- [SoK: Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09227/) (2025)
- [Unlearning That Lasts: Utility-Preserving, Robust, and Almost Irreversible Forgetting in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.02820/) (2025)
- [Omni-Reward: Towards Generalist Omni-Modal Reward Modeling with Free-Form Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.23451/) (2025)
- [Machine Unlearning under Retain-Forget Entanglement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.26569/) (2026)
- [Improving LLM Unlearning Robustness via Random Perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.19202/) (2025)
- [R-TOFU: Unlearning in Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15214/) (2025)
- [Keeping an Eye on LLM Unlearning: The Hidden Risk and Remedy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.00359/) (2025)
- [Existing Large Language Model Unlearning Evaluations Are Inconclusive](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.00688/) (2025)
- [LUNE: Efficient LLM Unlearning via LoRA Fine-Tuning with Negative Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.07375/) (2025)
- [Does Machine Unlearning Truly Remove Knowledge?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23270/) (2025)
- [Attention Smoothing Is All You Need For Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.01285/) (2026)
- [Metis: Memory Foundation Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.26760/) (2026)
- [CURE4Rec: A Benchmark for Recommendation Unlearning with Deeper Influence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.14393/) (2024)
- [PEBench: A Fictitious Dataset to Benchmark Machine Unlearning for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.12545/) (2025)
- [Erasing Without Remembering: Implicit Knowledge Forgetting in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19982/) (2025)
- ["Alexa, can you forget me?" Machine Unlearning Benchmark in Spoken Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15700/) (2025)
- [Erase or Hide? Suppressing Spurious Unlearning Neurons for Robust Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.22263/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) inevitably memorize sensitive, copyrighted, and harmful knowledge from the training corpus; therefore, it is crucial to erase this knowledge from the models. Machine unlearning is a promising solution for efficiently removing specific knowledge by post hoc modifying models. In this paper, we propose a Real-World Knowledge Unlearning benchmark (RWKU) for LLM unlearning. RWKU is designed based on the following three key factors: (1) For the task setting, we consider a more practical and challenging unlearning setting, where neither the forget corpus nor the retain corpus is accessible. (2) For the knowledge source, we choose 200 real-world famous people as the unlearning targets and show that such popular knowledge is widely present in various LLMs. (3) For the evaluation framework, we design the forget set and the retain set to evaluate the model's capabilities across various real-world applications. Regarding the forget set, we provide four four membership inference attack (MIA) methods and nine kinds of adversarial attack probes to rigorously test unlearning efficacy. Regarding the retain set, we assess locality and utility in terms of neighbor perturbation, general ability, reasoning ability, truthfulness, factuality, and fluency. We conduct extensive experiments across two unlearning scenarios, two models and six baseline methods and obtain some meaningful findings. We release our benchmark and code publicly at http://rwku-bench.github.io for future work.
