# Facts-and-Feelings: Capturing both Objectivity and Subjectivity in Table-to-Text Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.10560 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10560/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [ToTTo: A Controlled Table-To-Text Generation Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14373/) (2020)
- [Challenges in Data-to-Document Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.08052/) (2017)
- [Handling Divergent Reference Texts when Evaluating Table-to-Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.01081/) (2019)
- [Data-to-Text Generation with Content Selection and Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.00582/) (2018)
- [Text-to-Text Pre-Training for Data-to-Text Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.10433/) (2020)
- [Controlling Hallucinations at Word Level in Data-to-Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.02810/) (2021)
- [Data-to-text Generation with Macro Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.02723/) (2021)
- [Robust (Controlled) Table-to-Text Generation with Structure-Aware Equivariance Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.03972/) (2022)
- [WikiTableT: A Large-Scale Data-to-Text Dataset for Generating Wikipedia Article Sections](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.14919/) (2020)
- [A Hierarchical Model for Data-to-Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.10011/) (2019)
- [Assessing the nature of large language models: A caution against anthropocentrism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.07683/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Ta-G-T: Subjectivity Capture in Table to Text Generation via RDF Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.19710/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Table-to-text generation, a long-standing challenge in natural language generation, has remained unexplored through the lens of subjectivity. Subjectivity here encompasses the comprehension of information derived from the table that cannot be described solely by objective data. Given the absence of pre-existing datasets, we introduce the Ta2TS dataset with 3849 data instances. We perform the task of fine-tuning sequence-to-sequence models on the linearized tables and prompting on popular large language models. We analyze the results from a quantitative and qualitative perspective to ensure the capture of subjectivity and factual consistency. The analysis shows the fine-tuned LMs can perform close to the prompted LLMs. Both the models can capture the tabular data, generating texts with 85.15% BERTScore and 26.28% Meteor score. To the best of our knowledge, we provide the first-of-its-kind dataset on tables with multiple genres and subjectivity included and present the first comprehensive analysis and comparison of different LLM performances on this task.