# Adversarial Patch for 3D Local Feature Extractor

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.08102 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08102/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 11 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6572/) (2014)
- [Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06083/) (2017)
- [SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11763/) (2019)
- [SuperPoint: Self-Supervised Interest Point Detection and Description](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.07629/) (2017)
- [LightGlue: Local Feature Matching at Light Speed](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13643/) (2023)
- [HPatches: A benchmark and evaluation of handcrafted and learned local descriptors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.05939/) (2017)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Local feature extractors are the cornerstone of many computer vision tasks. However, their vulnerability to adversarial attacks can significantly compromise their effectiveness. This paper discusses approaches to attack sophisticated local feature extraction algorithms and models to achieve two distinct goals: (1) forcing a match between originally non-matching image regions, and (2) preventing a match between originally matching regions. At the end of the paper, we discuss the performance and drawbacks of different patch generation methods.