# AustroTox: A Dataset for Target-Based Austrian German Offensive Language Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.08080 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08080/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.10289/) (2020)
- [Social Bias Frames: Reasoning about Social and Power Implications of Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03891/) (2019)
- [Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.08914/) (2016)
- [German's Next Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.10906/) (2020)
- [MultiVerS: Improving scientific claim verification with weak supervision and full-document context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.01640/) (2021)
- [Toward a Perspectivist Turn in Ground Truthing for Predictive Computing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.04270/) (2021)
- [Measuring the Reliability of Hate Speech Annotations: The Case of the European Refugee Crisis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.08118/) (2017)
- [Multilingual HateCheck: Functional Tests for Multilingual Hate Speech Detection Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.09917/) (2022)
- [Personalizing Content Moderation on Social Media: User Perspectives on Moderation Choices, Interface Design, and Labor](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10374/) (2023)
- [Improving Adversarial Data Collection by Supporting Annotators: Lessons from GAHD, a German Hate Speech Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.19559/) (2024)
- [Explainable Abuse Detection as Intent Classification and Slot Filling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02659/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [A Survey on Automatic Online Hate Speech Detection in Low-Resource Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.19017/) (2024)
- [Bye Bye Perspective API: Lessons for Building and Governing Measurement Infrastructure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.25580/) (2026)
- [Context-Aware Content Moderation for German Newspaper Comments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20963/) (2025)
- [From Ground Trust to Truth: Disparities in Offensive Language Judgments on Contemporary Korean Political Discourse](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.14712/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Model interpretability in toxicity detection greatly profits from token-level annotations. However, currently such annotations are only available in English. We introduce a dataset annotated for offensive language detection sourced from a news forum, notable for its incorporation of the Austrian German dialect, comprising 4,562 user comments. In addition to binary offensiveness classification, we identify spans within each comment constituting vulgar language or representing targets of offensive statements. We evaluate fine-tuned language models as well as large language models in a zero- and few-shot fashion. The results indicate that while fine-tuned models excel in detecting linguistic peculiarities such as vulgar dialect, large language models demonstrate superior performance in detecting offensiveness in AustroTox. We publish the data and code.
