# Fine-tuning with HED-IT: The impact of human post-editing for dialogical language models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07288 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07288/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 25 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14314/) (2023)
- [Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10560/) (2022)
- [Learning to summarize from human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01325/) (2020)
- [Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01373/) (2023)
- [LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11206/) (2023)
- [Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14233/) (2023)
- [From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12032/) (2023)
- [Human-in-the-Loop for Data Collection: a Multi-Target Counter Narrative Dataset to Fight Online Hate Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.08720/) (2021)
- [A Survey on Data Selection for LLM Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05123/) (2024)
- [PLACES: Prompting Language Models for Social Conversation Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.03269/) (2023)
- [Monolingual or Multilingual Instruction Tuning: Which Makes a Better Alpaca](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.08958/) (2023)
- [Generating Counter Narratives against Online Hate Speech: Data and Strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04216/) (2020)
- [BiToD: A Bilingual Multi-Domain Dataset For Task-Oriented Dialogue Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.02787/) (2021)
- [Leveraging Large Language Models to Power Chatbots for Collecting User Self-Reported Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.05843/) (2023)
- [Empowering Cross-lingual Abilities of Instruction-tuned Large Language Models by Translation-following demonstrations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.14186/) (2023)
- [Using Pre-Trained Language Models for Producing Counter Narratives Against Hate Speech: a Comparative Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.01440/) (2022)
- [Cabrita: closing the gap for foreign languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11878/) (2023)
- [LLaMAntino: LLaMA 2 Models for Effective Text Generation in Italian Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.09993/) (2023)
- [Fauno: The Italian Large Language Model that will leave you senza parole!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.14457/) (2023)
- [Examining a hate speech corpus for hate speech detection and popularity prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04661/) (2018)
- [Countering Misinformation via Emotional Response Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.10587/) (2023)
- [Put Chatbot into Its Interlocutor's Shoes: New Framework to Learn Chatbot Responding with Intention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.16429/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [NormGenesis: Multicultural Dialogue Generation via Exemplar-Guided Social Norm Modeling and Violation Recovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18395/) (2025)
- [HiCoLoRA: Addressing Context-Prompt Misalignment via Hierarchical Collaborative LoRA for Zero-Shot DST](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.19742/) (2025)
- [LLMberjack: Guided Trimming of Debate Trees for Multi-Party Conversation Creation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.04135/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Automatic methods for generating and gathering linguistic data have proven effective for fine-tuning Language Models (LMs) in languages less resourced than English. Still, while there has been emphasis on data quantity, less attention has been given to its quality. In this work, we investigate the impact of human intervention on machine-generated data when fine-tuning dialogical models. In particular, we study (1) whether post-edited dialogues exhibit higher perceived quality compared to the originals that were automatically generated; (2) whether fine-tuning with post-edited dialogues results in noticeable differences in the generated outputs; and (3) whether post-edited dialogues influence the outcomes when considering the parameter size of the LMs. To this end we created HED-IT, a large-scale dataset where machine-generated dialogues are paired with the version post-edited by humans. Using both the edited and unedited portions of HED-IT, we fine-tuned three different sizes of an LM. Results from both human and automatic evaluation show that the different quality of training data is clearly perceived and it has an impact also on the models trained on such data. Additionally, our findings indicate that larger models are less sensitive to data quality, whereas this has a crucial impact on smaller models. These results enhance our comprehension of the impact of human intervention on training data in the development of high-quality LMs.