# Optimisation of federated learning settings under statistical heterogeneity variations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.06340 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06340/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 23 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.04381/) (2018)
- [Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.06127/) (2018)
- [Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07873/) (2019)
- [Federated Learning with Non-IID Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.00582/) (2018)
- [Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06335/) (2019)
- [Federated Learning on Non-IID Data Silos: An Experimental Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.02079/) (2021)
- [Federated Learning with Matched Averaging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.06440/) (2020)
- [Federated Learning with Personalization Layers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.00818/) (2019)
- [Federated Learning on Non-IID Data: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06843/) (2021)
- [Improving Federated Learning Personalization via Model Agnostic Meta Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.12488/) (2019)
- [Client Selection in Federated Learning: Convergence Analysis and Power-of-Choice Selection Strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.01243/) (2020)
- [SCAFFOLD: Stochastic Controlled Averaging for Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.06378/) (2019)
- [Heterogeneous Federated Learning: State-of-the-art and Research Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.10616/) (2023)
- [Rethinking Architecture Design for Tackling Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06047/) (2021)
- [Federated Learning with Label Distribution Skew via Logits Calibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.00189/) (2022)
- [From Federated Learning to Federated Neural Architecture Search: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.05868/) (2020)
- [A Secure Federated Learning Framework for 5G Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.05752/) (2020)
- [Federated Learning and Wireless Communications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.05265/) (2020)
- [Rethinking Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learning: Introducing a New Notion and Standard Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.15595/) (2022)
- [DeepFace-EMD: Re-ranking Using Patch-wise Earth Mover's Distance Improves Out-Of-Distribution Face Identification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.04016/) (2021)
- [Federated Learning Versus Classical Machine Learning: A Convergence Comparison](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.10976/) (2021)
- [Federated Multi-Mini-Batch: An Efficient Training Approach to Federated Learning in Non-IID Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.07006/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Learning (FL) enables local devices to collaboratively learn a shared predictive model by only periodically sharing model parameters with a central aggregator. However, FL can be disadvantaged by statistical heterogeneity produced by the diversity in each local devices data distribution, which creates different levels of Independent and Identically Distributed (IID) data. Furthermore, this can be more complex when optimising different combinations of FL parameters and choosing optimal aggregation. In this paper, we present an empirical analysis of different FL training parameters and aggregators over various levels of statistical heterogeneity on three datasets. We propose a systematic data partition strategy to simulate different levels of statistical heterogeneity and a metric to measure the level of IID. Additionally, we empirically identify the best FL model and key parameters for datasets of different characteristics. On the basis of these, we present recommended guidelines for FL parameters and aggregators to optimise model performance under different levels of IID and with different datasets