# The BiGGen Bench: A Principled Benchmark for Fine-grained Evaluation of Language Models with Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.05761 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05761/

## Key facts

- Cited by 93 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 129 of its 183 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 129)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00796/) (2016)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [Qwen Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16609/) (2023)
- [Mistral 7B](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06825/) (2023)
- [Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10560/) (2022)
- [Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07682/) (2022)
- [Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.01691/) (2022)
- [G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16634/) (2023)
- [Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12950/) (2023)
- [WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13854/) (2023)
- [Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.04615/) (2022)
- [ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16789/) (2023)
- [Language Models as Knowledge Bases?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01066/) (2019)
- [Mixtral of Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04088/) (2024)
- [mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11934/) (2020)
- [WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.09332/) (2021)
- [AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03688/) (2023)
- [Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07911/) (2023)
- [OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07972/) (2024)
- [WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.12244/) (2023)
- [LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11206/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 93)

- [JudgeBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12784/) (2024)
- [To CoT or not to CoT? Chain-of-thought helps mainly on math and symbolic reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12183/) (2024)
- [AssistantBench: Can Web Agents Solve Realistic and Time-Consuming Tasks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.15711/) (2024)
- [A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.09037/) (2025)
- [TRAIL: Trace Reasoning and Agentic Issue Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.08638/) (2025)
- [Pangea: A Fully Open Multilingual Multimodal LLM for 39 Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16153/) (2024)
- [Rethinking Rubric Generation for Improving LLM Judge and Reward Modeling for Open-ended Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.05125/) (2026)
- [Which of These Best Describes Multiple Choice Evaluation with LLMs? A) Forced B) Flawed C) Fixable D) All of the Above](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14127/) (2025)
- [Evaluating Scoring Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.22316/) (2025)
- [CompassJudger-1: All-in-one Judge Model Helps Model Evaluation and Evolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16256/) (2024)
- [MM-Eval: A Multilingual Meta-Evaluation Benchmark for LLM-as-a-Judge and Reward Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17578/) (2024)
- [Direct Judgement Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.14664/) (2024)
- [Explore Theory of Mind: Program-guided adversarial data generation for theory of mind reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.12175/) (2024)
- [Finding Blind Spots in Evaluator LLMs with Interpretable Checklists](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13439/) (2024)
- [AI-LieDar: Examine the Trade-off Between Utility and Truthfulness in LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.09013/) (2024)
- [RewardAnything: Generalizable Principle-Following Reward Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.03637/) (2025)
- [Self-rationalization improves LLM as a fine-grained judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05495/) (2024)
- [R3: Robust Rubric-Agnostic Reward Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13388/) (2025)
- [From Calculation to Adjudication: Examining LLM judges on Mathematical Reasoning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.04168/) (2024)
- [An Empirical Analysis of Uncertainty in Large Language Model Evaluations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.10709/) (2025)
- [An Empirical Study of LLM-as-a-Judge: How Design Choices Impact Evaluation Reliability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13639/) (2025)
- [Cross-Lingual Auto Evaluation for Assessing Multilingual LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13394/) (2024)
- [GLIDER: Grading LLM Interactions and Decisions using Explainable Ranking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14140/) (2024)
- [ToolMem: Enhancing Multimodal Agents with Learnable Tool Capability Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.06664/) (2025)
- [Scaling Evaluation-time Compute with Reasoning Models as Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19877/) (2025)
- [EvalAgent: Discovering Implicit Evaluation Criteria from the Web](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.15219/) (2025)
- [Set-LLM: A Permutation-Invariant LLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15433/) (2025)
- [RubricRAG: Towards Interpretable and Reliable LLM Evaluation via Domain Knowledge Retrieval for Rubric Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.20882/) (2026)
- [PingPong: A Benchmark for Role-Playing Language Models with User Emulation and Multi-Model Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.06820/) (2024)
- [Conversational User-AI Intervention: A Study on Prompt Rewriting for Improved LLM Response Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.16789/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As language models (LMs) become capable of handling a wide range of tasks, their evaluation is becoming as challenging as their development. Most generation benchmarks currently assess LMs using abstract evaluation criteria like helpfulness and harmlessness, which often lack the flexibility and granularity of human assessment. Additionally, these benchmarks tend to focus disproportionately on specific capabilities such as instruction following, leading to coverage bias. To overcome these limitations, we introduce the BiGGen Bench, a principled generation benchmark designed to thoroughly evaluate nine distinct capabilities of LMs across 77 diverse tasks. A key feature of the BiGGen Bench is its use of instance-specific evaluation criteria, closely mirroring the nuanced discernment of human evaluation. We apply this benchmark to assess 103 frontier LMs using five evaluator LMs. Our code, data, and evaluation results are all publicly available at https://github.com/prometheus-eval/prometheus-eval/tree/main/BiGGen-Bench.