# Evolution-aware VAriance (EVA) Coreset Selection for Medical Image Classification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.05677 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05677/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 39 of its 71 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 39)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.04381/) (2018)
- [A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.05747/) (2017)
- [Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.06872/) (2018)
- [MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14795/) (2021)
- [An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.05159/) (2018)
- [Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Bounds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.03671/) (2019)
- [Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.07075/) (2021)
- [Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14486/) (2022)
- [The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.04056/) (2019)
- [What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.03703/) (2020)
- [Dataset Distillation by Matching Training Trajectories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11932/) (2022)
- [Selection via Proxy: Efficient Data Selection for Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.11829/) (2019)
- [Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.00942/) (2018)
- [GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00123/) (2021)
- [Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Ranking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.10528/) (2020)
- [GLISTER: Generalization based Data Subset Selection for Efficient and Robust Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.10630/) (2020)
- [Parametric Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.12028/) (2021)
- [Dataset Condensation via Efficient Synthetic-Data Parameterization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14959/) (2022)
- [Adversarial Active Learning for Deep Networks: a Margin Based Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.09841/) (2018)
- [Active Learning by Acquiring Contrastive Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.03764/) (2021)
- [Active Bias: Training More Accurate Neural Networks by Emphasizing High Variance Samples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.07433/) (2017)
- [DeepCore: A Comprehensive Library for Coreset Selection in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.08499/) (2022)
- [Dataset Pruning: Reducing Training Data by Examining Generalization Influence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.09329/) (2022)
- [Online Batch Selection for Faster Training of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.06343/) (2015)
- [Online Coreset Selection for Rehearsal-based Continual Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01085/) (2021)
- [Coverage-centric Coreset Selection for High Pruning Rates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.15809/) (2022)
- [SIMILAR: Submodular Information Measures Based Active Learning In Realistic Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.00717/) (2021)
- [DC-BENCH: Dataset Condensation Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.09639/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [CXR-LT 2024: A MICCAI challenge on long-tailed, multi-label, and zero-shot disease classification from chest X-ray](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07984/) (2025)
- [Class-Proportional Coreset Selection for Difficulty-Separable Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.10904/) (2025)
- [DRIP: DRop unImportant data Points -- Enhancing Machine Learning Efficiency with Grad-CAM-Based Real-Time Data Prioritization for On-Device Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.08364/) (2025)
- [Accelerating Benchmarking of Functional Connectivity Modeling via Structure-aware Core-set Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.05667/) (2026)
- [Coreset selection based on Intra-class diversity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.21380/) (2025)
- [Data Efficiency and Transfer Robustness in Biomedical Image Segmentation: A Study of Redundancy and Forgetting with Cellpose](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.04803/) (2025)
- [One-Shot Data Selection for Medical Image Classification via Graph Coverage](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.22002/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In the medical field, managing high-dimensional massive medical imaging data and performing reliable medical analysis from it is a critical challenge, especially in resource-limited environments such as remote medical facilities and mobile devices. This necessitates effective dataset compression techniques to reduce storage, transmission, and computational cost. However, existing coreset selection methods are primarily designed for natural image datasets, and exhibit doubtful effectiveness when applied to medical image datasets due to challenges such as intra-class variation and inter-class similarity. In this paper, we propose a novel coreset selection strategy termed as Evolution-aware VAriance (EVA), which captures the evolutionary process of model training through a dual-window approach and reflects the fluctuation of sample importance more precisely through variance measurement. Extensive experiments on medical image datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our strategy over previous SOTA methods, especially at high compression rates. EVA achieves 98.27% accuracy with only 10% training data, compared to 97.20% for the full training set. None of the compared baseline methods can exceed Random at 5% selection rate, while EVA outperforms Random by 5.61%, showcasing its potential for efficient medical image analysis.