# Can Prompt Modifiers Control Bias? A Comparative Analysis of Text-to-Image Generative Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.05602 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05602/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.03585/) (2015)
- [LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.08402/) (2022)
- [Improved Techniques for Training GANs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.03498/) (2016)
- [InstructPix2Pix: Learning to Follow Image Editing Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.09800/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09635/) (2019)
- [Model Cards for Model Reporting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.03993/) (2018)
- [GLIGEN: Open-Set Grounded Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.07093/) (2023)
- [AttnGAN: Fine-Grained Text to Image Generation with Attentional Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.10485/) (2017)
- [DiffEdit: Diffusion-based semantic image editing with mask guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11427/) (2022)
- [DALL-Eval: Probing the Reasoning Skills and Social Biases of Text-to-Image Generation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.04053/) (2022)
- [SpaText: Spatio-Textual Representation for Controllable Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.14305/) (2022)
- [ReCo: Region-Controlled Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.15518/) (2022)
- [Fair Diffusion: Instructing Text-to-Image Generation Models on Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.10893/) (2023)
- [Social Biases through the Text-to-Image Generation Lens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06034/) (2023)
- [The Bias Amplification Paradox in Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00755/) (2023)
- [Disclosure and Mitigation of Gender Bias in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11190/) (2024)
- [Exploiting Cultural Biases via Homoglyphs in Text-to-Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.08891/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Ethics Whitepaper: Whitepaper on Ethical Research into Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.19812/) (2024)
- [Who Does What? Archetypes of Roles Assigned to LLMs During Human-AI Decision-Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11924/) (2026)
- [Minimalist Preprocessing Approach for Image Synthesis Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.25297/) (2026)
- [Statistical attribute alignment for black-box generative AI via output post-processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.31607/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

It has been shown that many generative models inherit and amplify societal biases. To date, there is no uniform/systematic agreed standard to control/adjust for these biases. This study examines the presence and manipulation of societal biases in leading text-to-image models: Stable Diffusion, DALL-E 3, and Adobe Firefly. Through a comprehensive analysis combining base prompts with modifiers and their sequencing, we uncover the nuanced ways these AI technologies encode biases across gender, race, geography, and region/culture. Our findings reveal the challenges and potential of prompt engineering in controlling biases, highlighting the critical need for ethical AI development promoting diversity and inclusivity. This work advances AI ethics by not only revealing the nuanced dynamics of bias in text-to-image generation models but also by offering a novel framework for future research in controlling bias. Our contributions-panning comparative analyses, the strategic use of prompt modifiers, the exploration of prompt sequencing effects, and the introduction of a bias sensitivity taxonomy-lay the groundwork for the development of common metrics and standard analyses for evaluating whether and how future AI models exhibit and respond to requests to adjust for inherent biases.