# DALD: Improving Logits-based Detector without Logits from Black-box LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.05232 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05232/

## Key facts

- Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 43 of its 60 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 43)

- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Mistral 7B](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06825/) (2023)
- [Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.08745/) (2018)
- [PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06146/) (2019)
- [Hierarchical Neural Story Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04833/) (2018)
- [Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.09938/) (2021)
- [DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.11305/) (2023)
- [A Watermark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.10226/) (2023)
- [WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01470/) (2024)
- [Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09203/) (2019)
- [GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.04043/) (2019)
- [Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defense](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13408/) (2023)
- [Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11156/) (2023)
- [Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05130/) (2023)
- [Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12070/) (2024)
- [Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooled](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.00650/) (2019)
- [Undetectable Watermarks for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09194/) (2023)
- [DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05540/) (2023)
- [GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02819/) (2023)
- [RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.07940/) (2024)
- [Adversarial Watermarking Transformer: Towards Tracing Text Provenance with Data Hiding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03015/) (2020)
- [DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17359/) (2023)
- [Intrinsic Dimension Estimation for Robust Detection of AI-Generated Texts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04723/) (2023)
- [On the Possibilities of AI-Generated Text Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.04736/) (2023)
- [Detecting Multimedia Generated by Large AI Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00045/) (2024)
- [Do Language Models Plagiarize?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.07618/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Content](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15654/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [AdaDetectGPT: Adaptive Detection of LLM-Generated Text with Statistical Guarantees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.01268/) (2025)
- [Glimpse: Enabling White-Box Methods to Use Proprietary Models for Zero-Shot LLM-Generated Text Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11506/) (2024)
- [Human Texts Are Outliers: Detecting LLM-generated Texts via Out-of-distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.08602/) (2025)
- [Learn-to-Distance: Distance Learning for Detecting LLM-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.21895/) (2026)
- [A Training-free Method for LLM Text Attribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.02406/) (2025)
- [Advancing Machine-Generated Text Detection from an Easy to Hard Supervision Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.00988/) (2025)
- [MAGA-Bench: Machine-Augment-Generated Text via Alignment Detection Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.04633/) (2026)
- [SearchLLM: Detecting LLM Paraphrased Text by Measuring the Similarity with Regeneration of the Candidate Source via Search Engine](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.16512/) (2026)
- [Enabling Fine-Grained Operating Points for Black-Box LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.17727/) (2025)
- [Attribution-Driven Explainable Intrusion Detection with Encoder-Based Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.06266/) (2026)
- [Log-Likelihood, Simpson's Paradox, and the Detection of Machine-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.06294/) (2026)
- [Adversarial Reframing: A Framework for Targeted Generation in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.21674/) (2026)
- [SenFlow: Inter-Sentence Flow Modeling for AI-Generated Text Detection in Hybrid Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.18946/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has revolutionized text generation, producing outputs that closely mimic human writing. This blurring of lines between machine- and human-written text presents new challenges in distinguishing one from the other a task further complicated by the frequent updates and closed nature of leading proprietary LLMs. Traditional logits-based detection methods leverage surrogate models for identifying LLM-generated content when the exact logits are unavailable from black-box LLMs. However, these methods grapple with the misalignment between the distributions of the surrogate and the often undisclosed target models, leading to performance degradation, particularly with the introduction of new, closed-source models. Furthermore, while current methodologies are generally effective when the source model is identified, they falter in scenarios where the model version remains unknown, or the test set comprises outputs from various source models. To address these limitations, we present Distribution-Aligned LLMs Detection (DALD), an innovative framework that redefines the state-of-the-art performance in black-box text detection even without logits from source LLMs. DALD is designed to align the surrogate model's distribution with that of unknown target LLMs, ensuring enhanced detection capability and resilience against rapid model iterations with minimal training investment. By leveraging corpus samples from publicly accessible outputs of advanced models such as ChatGPT, GPT-4 and Claude-3, DALD fine-tunes surrogate models to synchronize with unknown source model distributions effectively.
