# Group Robust Preference Optimization in Reward-free RLHF

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20304 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20304/

## Key facts

- Cited by 95 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 45 of its 61 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 May 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reinforcement learning for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reinforcement-learning-for-reasoning/)
- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Process reward models for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/process-reward-models-for-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 45)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [Learning to summarize from human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01325/) (2020)
- [Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.08593/) (2019)
- [WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.09332/) (2021)
- [Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01345/) (2021)
- [Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.08731/) (2019)
- [Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.10760/) (2022)
- [Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08295/) (2024)
- [A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12036/) (2023)
- [Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15217/) (2023)
- [RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06767/) (2023)
- [Self-Rewarding Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10020/) (2024)
- [Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12773/) (2023)
- [Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01335/) (2024)
- [Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) for Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08998/) (2023)
- [Towards Measuring the Representation of Subjective Global Opinions in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.16388/) (2023)
- [SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10425/) (2023)
- [DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model Pretraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10429/) (2023)
- [Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11456/) (2023)
- [Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.06585/) (2023)
- [Preference Ranking Optimization for Human Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17492/) (2023)
- [A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14925/) (2023)
- [Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.00675/) (2024)
- [Nash Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.00886/) (2023)
- [A Roadmap to Pluralistic Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05070/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 95)

- [Dynamic Early Exit in Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.15895/) (2025)
- [A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.09037/) (2025)
- [S-GRPO: Early Exit via Reinforcement Learning in Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.07686/) (2025)
- [PERSONA: A Reproducible Testbed for Pluralistic Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.17387/) (2024)
- [Wait, We Don't Need to "Wait"! Removing Thinking Tokens Improves Reasoning Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.08343/) (2025)
- [Diverging Preferences: When do Annotators Disagree and do Models Know?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14632/) (2024)
- [LLMs are Greedy Agents: Effects of RL Fine-tuning on Decision-Making Abilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16078/) (2025)
- [AsyncFlow: An Asynchronous Streaming RL Framework for Efficient LLM Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.01663/) (2025)
- [A Survey of Direct Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.11701/) (2025)
- [OctoNav: Towards Generalist Embodied Navigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09839/) (2025)
- [Asymmetric REINFORCE for off-Policy Reinforcement Learning: Balancing positive and negative rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.20520/) (2025)
- [Learning to Reason at the Frontier of Learnability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12272/) (2025)
- [No Preference Left Behind: Group Distributional Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.20299/) (2024)
- [Robust LLM Alignment via Distributionally Robust Direct Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01930/) (2025)
- [Towards a Unified View of Preference Learning for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.02795/) (2024)
- [Not All Thoughts are Generated Equal: Efficient LLM Reasoning via Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11827/) (2025)
- [On Almost Surely Safe Alignment of Large Language Models at Inference-Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01208/) (2025)
- [Right Now, Wrong Then: Non-Stationary Direct Preference Optimization under Preference Drift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18676/) (2024)
- [Robust Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for Large Language Models Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.03784/) (2025)
- [Self-Compression of Chain-of-Thought via Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.21919/) (2026)
- [FedRLHF: A Convergence-Guaranteed Federated Framework for Privacy-Preserving and Personalized RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15538/) (2024)
- [Distributionally Robust Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.00539/) (2025)
- [OpenApps: Simulating Environment Variations to Measure UI-Agent Reliability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.20766/) (2025)
- [Projection Optimization: A General Framework for Multi-Objective and Multi-Group RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.15145/) (2025)
- [Low-Rank Contextual Reinforcement Learning from Heterogeneous Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.19436/) (2024)
- [Large Reasoning Models are not thinking straight: on the unreliability of thinking trajectories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.00711/) (2025)
- [Robust Multi-Objective Controlled Decoding of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.08796/) (2025)
- [UniGame: Turning a Unified Multimodal Model Into Its Own Adversary](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.19413/) (2025)
- [Thinking Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13173/) (2025)
- [A Review of Incorporating Psychological Theories in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.00003/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Adapting large language models (LLMs) for specific tasks usually involves fine-tuning through reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) on preference data. While these data often come from diverse labelers' groups (e.g., different demographics, ethnicities, company teams, etc.), traditional RLHF approaches adopt a "one-size-fits-all" approach, i.e., they indiscriminately assume and optimize a single preference model, thus not being robust to unique characteristics and needs of the various groups. To address this limitation, we propose a novel Group Robust Preference Optimization (GRPO) method to align LLMs to individual groups' preferences robustly. Our approach builds upon reward-free direct preference optimization methods, but unlike previous approaches, it seeks a robust policy which maximizes the worst-case group performance. To achieve this, GRPO adaptively and sequentially weights the importance of different groups, prioritizing groups with worse cumulative loss. We theoretically study the feasibility of GRPO and analyze its convergence for the log-linear policy class. By fine-tuning LLMs with GRPO using diverse group-based global opinion data, we significantly improved performance for the worst-performing groups, reduced loss imbalances across groups, and improved probability accuracies compared to non-robust baselines.