# Can the accuracy bias by facial hairstyle be reduced through balancing the training data?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20062 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20062/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 38 of its 51 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 May 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 38)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clustering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.03832/) (2015)
- [A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09635/) (2019)
- [On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.08734/) (2018)
- [Random Erasing Data Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.04896/) (2017)
- [CosFace: Large Margin Cosine Loss for Deep Face Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.09414/) (2018)
- [The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10345/) (2017)
- [BiSeNet: Bilateral Segmentation Network for Real-time Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.00897/) (2018)
- [How far are we from solving the 2D & 3D Face Alignment problem? (and a dataset of 230,000 3D facial landmarks)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.07332/) (2017)
- [Learning Face Representation from Scratch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.7923/) (2014)
- [AdaFace: Quality Adaptive Margin for Face Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.00964/) (2022)
- [MagFace: A Universal Representation for Face Recognition and Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.06627/) (2021)
- [Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03683/) (2019)
- [Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.10352/) (2018)
- [Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11834/) (2019)
- [WebFace260M: A Benchmark Unveiling the Power of Million-Scale Deep Face Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.04098/) (2021)
- [Training behavior of deep neural network in frequency domain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.01251/) (2018)
- [Towards Understanding the Spectral Bias of Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01198/) (2019)
- [Demographic Bias in Biometrics: A Survey on an Emerging Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.02488/) (2020)
- [A Comprehensive Study on Face Recognition Biases Beyond Demographics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.01592/) (2021)
- [A Survey on Bias in Visual Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.07919/) (2021)
- [Face Recognition: Too Bias, or Not Too Bias?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.06483/) (2020)
- [Accuracy comparison across face recognition algorithms: Where are we on measuring race bias?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.07398/) (2019)
- [Fairness in Biometrics: a figure of merit to assess biometric verification systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.02395/) (2020)
- [Consistent Instance False Positive Improves Fairness in Face Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.05519/) (2021)
- [Biometrics: Trust, but Verify](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.06625/) (2021)
- [How Does Gender Balance In Training Data Affect Face Recognition Accuracy?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.02934/) (2020)
- [InsideBias: Measuring Bias in Deep Networks and Application to Face Gender Biometrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.06592/) (2020)
- [An Experimental Evaluation of Covariates Effects on Unconstrained Face Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.05508/) (2018)
- [Face Recognition Accuracy Across Demographics: Shining a Light Into the Problem](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.01881/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [FRoundation: Are Foundation Models Ready for Face Recognition?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.23831/) (2024)
- [Review of Demographic Fairness in Face Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.02309/) (2025)
- [Lights, Camera, Matching: The Role of Image Illumination in Fair Face Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.08910/) (2025)
- [Vec2Face+ for Face Dataset Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.17192/) (2025)
- [Revisiting Face Recognition for Monozygotic Twins: The Celeb Twins Test Set](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.01141/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Appearance of a face can be greatly altered by growing a beard and mustache. The facial hairstyles in a pair of images can cause marked changes to the impostor distribution and the genuine distribution. Also, different distributions of facial hairstyle across demographics could cause a false impression of relative accuracy across demographics. We first show that, even though larger training sets boost the recognition accuracy on all facial hairstyles, accuracy variations caused by facial hairstyles persist regardless of the size of the training set. Then, we analyze the impact of having different fractions of the training data represent facial hairstyles. We created balanced training sets using a set of identities available in Webface42M that both have clean-shaven and facial hair images. We find that, even when a face recognition model is trained with a balanced clean-shaven / facial hair training set, accuracy variation on the test data does not diminish. Next, data augmentation is employed to further investigate the effect of facial hair distribution in training data by manipulating facial hair pixels with the help of facial landmark points and a facial hair segmentation model. Our results show facial hair causes an accuracy gap between clean-shaven and facial hair images, and this impact can be significantly different between African-Americans and Caucasians.
