# Reconciling Safety Measurement and Dynamic Assurance

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.19641 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19641/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 30 May 2024.

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [A Subjective Logic-based method for runtime confidence updates in safety arguments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.22530/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a new framework to facilitate dynamic assurance within a safety case approach by associating safety performance measurement with the core assurance artifacts of a safety case. The focus is mainly on the safety architecture, whose underlying risk assessment model gives the concrete link from safety measurement to operational risk. Using an aviation domain example of autonomous taxiing, we describe our approach to derive safety indicators and revise the risk assessment based on safety measurement. We then outline a notion of consistency between a collection of safety indicators and the safety case, as a formal basis for implementing the proposed framework in our tool, AdvoCATE.