# Network Analytics for Anti-Money Laundering -- A Systematic Literature Review and Experimental Evaluation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.19383 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19383/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 39 of its 169 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 May 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 39)

- [Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.02907/) (2016)
- [Graph Attention Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10903/) (2017)
- [Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02216/) (2017)
- [How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.00826/) (2018)
- [Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1301.3781/) (2013)
- [A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.00596/) (2019)
- [Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.10902/) (2019)
- [Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.02428/) (2019)
- [node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.00653/) (2016)
- [Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.08434/) (2018)
- [DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1403.6652/) (2014)
- [Deeper Insights into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.07606/) (2018)
- [Revisiting Semi-Supervised Learning with Graph Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.08861/) (2016)
- [How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.14491/) (2021)
- [A Comprehensive Survey of Graph Embedding: Problems, Techniques and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.07604/) (2017)
- [Graph Embedding Techniques, Applications, and Performance: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.02801/) (2017)
- [Graph-based Anomaly Detection and Description: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1404.4679/) (2014)
- [Anti-Money Laundering in Bitcoin: Experimenting with Graph Convolutional Networks for Financial Forensics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.02591/) (2019)
- [Realistic Synthetic Financial Transactions for Anti-Money Laundering Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.16424/) (2023)
- [Provably Powerful Graph Neural Networks for Directed Multigraphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.11586/) (2023)
- [Detecting Mixing Services via Mining Bitcoin Transaction Network with Hybrid Motifs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.05233/) (2020)
- [Machine learning methods to detect money laundering in the Bitcoin blockchain in the presence of label scarcity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14635/) (2020)
- [LaundroGraph: Self-Supervised Graph Representation Learning for Anti-Money Laundering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.14360/) (2022)
- [Learning to rank for uplift modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.05897/) (2020)
- [Behavior-aware Account De-anonymization on Ethereum Interaction Graph](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.09360/) (2022)
- [The Journal Coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a Comparative Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.08096/) (2015)
- [Using social network analysis to prevent money laundering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.05793/) (2021)
- [Topology-Agnostic Detection of Temporal Money Laundering Flows in Billion-Scale Transactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13662/) (2023)
- [Heterogeneous Feature Augmentation for Ponzi Detection in Ethereum](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.08916/) (2022)
- [Graph Computing for Financial Crime and Fraud Detection: Trends, Challenges and Outlook](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03227/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [A Survey of Cross-domain Graph Learning: Progress and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.11086/) (2025)
- [Advances in Continual Graph Learning for Anti-Money Laundering Systems: A Comprehensive Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.24259/) (2025)
- [Normalisation and Initialisation Strategies for Graph Neural Networks in Blockchain Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.23599/) (2026)
- [GARG-AML against Smurfing: A Scalable and Interpretable Graph-Based Framework for Anti-Money Laundering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04292/) (2025)
- [Full-History Graphs with Edge-Type Decoupled Networks for Temporal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03251/) (2025)
- [Inductive inference of gradient-boosted decision trees on graphs for insurance fraud detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.05676/) (2025)
- [From Accuracy to Auditability: A Survey of Determinism in Financial AI Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.23955/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Money laundering presents a pervasive challenge, burdening society by financing illegal activities. The use of network information is increasingly being explored to effectively combat money laundering, given it involves connected parties. This led to a surge in research on network analytics for anti-money laundering (AML). The literature is, however, fragmented and a comprehensive overview of existing work is missing. This results in limited understanding of the methods to apply and their comparative detection power. This paper presents an extensive and unique literature review, based on 97 papers from Web of Science and Scopus, resulting in a taxonomy following a recently proposed fraud analytics framework. We conclude that most research relies on expert-based rules and manual features, while deep learning methods have been gaining traction. This paper also presents a comprehensive framework to evaluate and compare the performance of prominent methods in a standardized setup. We compare manual feature engineering, random walk-based, and deep learning methods on two publicly available data sets. We conclude that (1) network analytics increases the predictive power, but caution is needed when applying GNNs in the face of class imbalance and network topology, and that (2) care should be taken with synthetic data as this can give overly optimistic results. The open-source implementation facilitates researchers and practitioners to extend this work on proprietary data, promoting a standardised approach for the analysis and evaluation of network analytics for AML.
