# Counterfactual Metarules for Local and Global Recourse

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18875 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.18875/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 May 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.02754/) (2016)
- [Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00399/) (2017)
- [Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07697/) (2019)
- [FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.09369/) (2019)
- [Multi-Objective Counterfactual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.11165/) (2020)
- [Learning Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Tabular Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.09398/) (2019)
- [Beyond Trivial Counterfactual Explanations with Diverse Valuable Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.10226/) (2021)
- [A Survey on the Robustness of Feature Importance and Counterfactual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.00358/) (2021)
- [GLOBE-CE: A Translation-Based Approach for Global Counterfactual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17021/) (2023)
- [Counterfactual Explanations for Arbitrary Regression Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.15212/) (2021)
- [Explaining Groups of Instances Counterfactually for XAI: A Use Case, Algorithm and User Study for Group-Counterfactuals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.09297/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Learning-Augmented Robust Algorithmic Recourse](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.01580/) (2024)
- [Optimal Robust Recourse with Lp-Bounded Model Change](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.21293/) (2025)
- [Synthesising Counterfactual Explanations via Label-Conditional Gaussian Mixture Variational Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04855/) (2025)
- [Optimal Recourse Summaries via Bi-Objective Decision Tree Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.07598/) (2026)
- [The Role of Causality in Algorithmic Recourse](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.28497/) (2026)
- [CEL: Comprehensive Counterfactual Explanations Library and Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.22045/) (2026)
- [Algorithmic Recourse Under Competition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.39877/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce T-CREx, a novel model-agnostic method for local and global counterfactual explanation (CE), which summarises recourse options for both individuals and groups in the form of human-readable rules. It leverages tree-based surrogate models to learn the counterfactual rules, alongside 'metarules' denoting their regions of optimality, providing both a global analysis of model behaviour and diverse recourse options for users. Experiments indicate that T-CREx achieves superior aggregate performance over existing rule-based baselines on a range of CE desiderata, while being orders of magnitude faster to run.
