# E2M: Double Bounded α-Divergence Optimization for Tensor-based Discrete Density Estimation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18220 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.18220/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 28 May 2024.

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [What is the Relationship between Tensor Factorizations and Circuits (and How Can We Exploit it)?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.07953/) (2024)
- [VRIQ: Benchmarking and Analyzing Visual-Reasoning IQ of VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.05382/) (2026)
- [Near-Universal Multiplicative Updates for Nonnegative Einsum Factorization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02759/) (2026)
- [Even More Guarantees for Variational Inference in the Presence of Symmetries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.21407/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Tensor-based discrete density estimation requires flexible modeling and proper divergence criteria to enable effective learning; however, traditional approaches using α-divergence face analytical challenges due to the α-power terms in the objective function, which hinder the derivation of closed-form update rules. We present a generalization of the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm, called the E2M algorithm. It circumvents this issue by first relaxing the optimization into the minimization of a surrogate objective based on the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, which is tractable via the standard EM algorithm, and subsequently applying a tensor many-body approximation in the M-step to enable simultaneous closed-form updates of all parameters. Our approach offers flexible modeling for not only a variety of low-rank structures, including the CP, Tucker, and Tensor Train formats, but also their mixtures, thus allowing us to leverage the strengths of different low-rank structures. We evaluate the effectiveness of our approach on synthetic and real datasets, highlighting its comparable convergence to gradient-based procedures, robustness to outliers, and favorable density estimation performance compared to prominent existing tensor-based methods.
