# Locally Testing Model Detections for Semantic Global Concepts

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17523 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.17523/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 31 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 May 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.01365/) (2017)
- [Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6034/) (2013)
- [Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.02685/) (2017)
- [Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.11279/) (2017)
- [SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noise](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03825/) (2017)
- [This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.10574/) (2018)
- [Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.05796/) (2017)
- [Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learned](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.06321/) (2015)
- [European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.08813/) (2016)
- [Concept Whitening for Interpretable Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.01650/) (2020)
- [CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.10154/) (2022)
- [From Attribution Maps to Human-Understandable Explanations through Concept Relevance Propagation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.03208/) (2022)
- [Net2Vec: Quantifying and Explaining how Concepts are Encoded by Filters in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.03454/) (2018)
- [Ground Truth Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations with CLEVR-XAI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.07258/) (2020)
- [Invertible Concept-based Explanations for CNN Models with Non-negative Concept Activation Vectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.15417/) (2020)
- [A Comprehensive Taxonomy for Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Survey of Surveys on Methods and Concepts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.07190/) (2021)
- [Towards Best Practice in Explaining Neural Network Decisions with LRP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.09840/) (2019)
- [Concept Activation Regions: A Generalized Framework For Concept-Based Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.11222/) (2022)
- [Software for Dataset-wide XAI: From Local Explanations to Global Insights with Zennit, CoRelAy, and ViRelAy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.13200/) (2021)
- [Multi-dimensional concept discovery (MCD): A unifying framework with completeness guarantees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.11911/) (2023)
- [Beyond Explaining: Opportunities and Challenges of XAI-Based Model Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.08008/) (2022)
- [Disentangled Explanations of Neural Network Predictions by Finding Relevant Subspaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.14855/) (2022)
- [Revealing Hidden Context Bias in Segmentation and Object Detection through Concept-specific Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.11426/) (2022)
- [Concept Saliency Maps to Visualize Relevant Features in Deep Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.13140/) (2019)
- [Optimizing Explanations by Network Canonization and Hyperparameter Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.17174/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Concept-Based Explanations in Computer Vision: Where Are We and Where Could We Go?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13456/) (2024)
- [CE-FAM: Concept-Based Explanation via Fusion of Activation Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.23849/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Ensuring the quality of black-box Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) has become ever more significant, especially in safety-critical domains such as automated driving. While global concept encodings generally enable a user to test a model for a specific concept, linking global concept encodings to the local processing of single network inputs reveals their strengths and limitations. Our proposed framework global-to-local Concept Attribution (glCA) uses approaches from local (why a specific prediction originates) and global (how a model works generally) eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (xAI) to test DNNs for a predefined semantical concept locally. The approach allows for conditioning local, post-hoc explanations on predefined semantic concepts encoded as linear directions in the model's latent space. Pixel-exact scoring concerning the global concept usage assists the tester in further understanding the model processing of single data points for the selected concept. Our approach has the advantage of fully covering the model-internal encoding of the semantic concept and allowing the localization of relevant concept-related information. The results show major differences in the local perception and usage of individual global concept encodings and demand for further investigations regarding obtaining thorough semantic concept encodings.
