# CIVICS: Building a Dataset for Examining Culturally-Informed Values in Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.13974 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.13974/

## Key facts

- Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 26 of its 64 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 May 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 26 of 26)

- [Red Teaming Language Models with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03286/) (2022)
- [Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17548/) (2023)
- [Aligning AI With Shared Human Values](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.02275/) (2020)
- [OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07327/) (2023)
- [Towards Measuring the Representation of Subjective Global Opinions in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.16388/) (2023)
- [Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.05374/) (2023)
- [Do Prompt-Based Models Really Understand the Meaning of their Prompts?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01247/) (2021)
- [From Pretraining Data to Language Models to Downstream Tasks: Tracking the Trails of Political Biases Leading to Unfair NLP Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08283/) (2023)
- [Social Chemistry 101: Learning to Reason about Social and Moral Norms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.00620/) (2020)
- [Challenges and Strategies in Cross-Cultural NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10020/) (2022)
- [Evaluating the Moral Beliefs Encoded in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.14324/) (2023)
- [Assessing Cross-Cultural Alignment between ChatGPT and Human Societies: An Empirical Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17466/) (2023)
- [The political ideology of conversational AI: Converging evidence on ChatGPT's pro-environmental, left-libertarian orientation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.01768/) (2023)
- [Cultural Bias and Cultural Alignment of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.14096/) (2023)
- [Moral Stories: Situated Reasoning about Norms, Intents, Actions, and their Consequences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.15738/) (2020)
- [The Ghost in the Machine has an American accent: value conflict in GPT-3](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.07785/) (2022)
- [NLPositionality: Characterizing Design Biases of Datasets and Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01943/) (2023)
- [SeaEval for Multilingual Foundation Models: From Cross-Lingual Alignment to Cultural Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.04766/) (2023)
- [CValues: Measuring the Values of Chinese Large Language Models from Safety to Responsibility](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09705/) (2023)
- [Moral Mimicry: Large Language Models Produce Moral Rationalizations Tailored to Political Identity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.12106/) (2022)
- [Automating Customer Service using LangChain: Building custom open-source GPT Chatbot for organizations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05421/) (2023)
- [MoCa: Measuring Human-Language Model Alignment on Causal and Moral Judgment Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19677/) (2023)
- [Assessing LLMs for Moral Value Pluralism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10075/) (2023)
- [KorNAT: LLM Alignment Benchmark for Korean Social Values and Common Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13605/) (2024)
- [NormDial: A Comparable Bilingual Synthetic Dialog Dataset for Modeling Social Norm Adherence and Violation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.14563/) (2023)
- [Task Supportive and Personalized Human-Large Language Model Interaction: A User Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06170/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Large Language Models Often Know When They Are Being Evaluated](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23836/) (2025)
- [Survey of Cultural Awareness in Language Models: Text and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00860/) (2024)
- [Benchmarking Distributional Alignment of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.05403/) (2024)
- [The State of Multilingual LLM Safety Research: From Measuring the Language Gap to Mitigating It](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24119/) (2025)
- [Cultivating Pluralism In Algorithmic Monoculture: The Community Alignment Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.09650/) (2025)
- [Multilingual Large Language Models: A Systematic Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.11072/) (2024)
- [Zhyper: Factorized Hypernetworks for Conditioned LLM Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.19733/) (2025)
- [C-VARC: A Large-Scale Chinese Value Rule Corpus for Value Alignment of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.01495/) (2025)
- [The Consensus Trap: Dissecting Subjectivity and the "Ground Truth" Illusion in Data Annotation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11318/) (2026)
- [The Culture Funnel: You Can't Align What isn't in the Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.13808/) (2026)
- [Distributional Open-Ended Evaluation of LLM Cultural Value Alignment Based on Value Codebook](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.06210/) (2026)
- [PLURAL: A Global Dataset for Value Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.08034/) (2026)
- [Unsupervised Elicitation of Moral Values from Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.17728/) (2026)
- [KG-FairDiff: Knowledge Graph-Guided Prompt Refinement for Demographically Fair Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.01282/) (2026)
- [MET: Theory-Grounded and Culture-Aware Multilingual Moral Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.11736/) (2026)
- [EvalDetectBench: A Benchmark for Measuring Evaluation Awareness in Frontier Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.01611/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper introduces the "CIVICS: Culturally-Informed & Values-Inclusive Corpus for Societal impacts" dataset, designed to evaluate the social and cultural variation of Large Language Models (LLMs) across multiple languages and value-sensitive topics. We create a hand-crafted, multilingual dataset of value-laden prompts which address specific socially sensitive topics, including LGBTQI rights, social welfare, immigration, disability rights, and surrogacy. CIVICS is designed to generate responses showing LLMs' encoded and implicit values. Through our dynamic annotation processes, tailored prompt design, and experiments, we investigate how open-weight LLMs respond to value-sensitive issues, exploring their behavior across diverse linguistic and cultural contexts. Using two experimental set-ups based on log-probabilities and long-form responses, we show social and cultural variability across different LLMs. Specifically, experiments involving long-form responses demonstrate that refusals are triggered disparately across models, but consistently and more frequently in English or translated statements. Moreover, specific topics and sources lead to more pronounced differences across model answers, particularly on immigration, LGBTQI rights, and social welfare. As shown by our experiments, the CIVICS dataset aims to serve as a tool for future research, promoting reproducibility and transparency across broader linguistic settings, and furthering the development of AI technologies that respect and reflect global cultural diversities and value pluralism. The CIVICS dataset and tools will be made available upon publication under open licenses; an anonymized version is currently available at https://huggingface.co/CIVICS-dataset.