# Trusting Fair Data: Leveraging Quality in Fairness-Driven Data Removal Techniques

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.12926 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.12926/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 5 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 May 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02413/) (2016)
- [A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09635/) (2019)
- [Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.08452/) (2016)
- [AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.01943/) (2018)
- [Removing biased data to improve fairness and accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.03054/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [FairFinGAN: Fairness-aware Synthetic Financial Data Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.05327/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we deal with bias mitigation techniques that remove specific data points from the training set to aim for a fair representation of the population in that set. Machine learning models are trained on these pre-processed datasets, and their predictions are expected to be fair. However, such approaches may exclude relevant data, making the attained subsets less trustworthy for further usage. To enhance the trustworthiness of prior methods, we propose additional requirements and objectives that the subsets must fulfill in addition to fairness: (1) group coverage, and (2) minimal data loss. While removing entire groups may improve the measured fairness, this practice is very problematic as failing to represent every group cannot be considered fair. In our second concern, we advocate for the retention of data while minimizing discrimination. By introducing a multi-objective optimization problem that considers fairness and data loss, we propose a methodology to find Pareto-optimal solutions that balance these objectives. By identifying such solutions, users can make informed decisions about the trade-off between fairness and data quality and select the most suitable subset for their application. Our method is distributed as a Python package via PyPI under the name FairDo (https://github.com/mkduong-ai/fairdo).