# Architectures and random properties of symplectic quantum circuits

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10264 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.10264/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 105 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 May 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.11173/) (2018)
- [Quantum advantage in learning from experiments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.00778/) (2021)
- [Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Computing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.00781/) (2024)
- [Absence of Barren Plateaus in Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.02966/) (2020)
- [Theory of overparametrization in quantum neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.11676/) (2021)
- [Does provable absence of barren plateaus imply classical simulability?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.09121/) (2023)
- [Exploiting symmetry in variational quantum machine learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.06217/) (2022)
- [Theory for Equivariant Quantum Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.08566/) (2022)
- [Exponential separations between learning with and without quantum memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.05881/) (2021)
- [Theoretical Guarantees for Permutation-Equivariant Quantum Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09974/) (2022)
- [Equivariant quantum circuits for learning on weighted graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.06109/) (2022)
- [Representation Theory for Geometric Quantum Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.07980/) (2022)
- [Speeding up Learning Quantum States through Group Equivariant Convolutional Quantum Ans"atze](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.07611/) (2021)
- [Quantum Deep Hedging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16585/) (2023)
- [Quantum neural networks form Gaussian processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.09957/) (2023)
- [On the universality of Sn-equivariant k-body gates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.00728/) (2023)
- [Trained quantum neural networks are Gaussian processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.08726/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Quantum Gaussian processes for prediction of channel observations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.19306/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Parametrized and random unitary (or orthogonal) n-qubit circuits play a central role in quantum information. As such, one could naturally assume that circuits implementing symplectic transformations would attract similar attention. However, this is not the case, as mathbbSP (d/2) -- the group of d× d unitary symplectic matrices -- has thus far been overlooked. In this work, we aim at starting to fill this gap. We begin by presenting a universal set of generators G for the symplectic algebra mathfraksp(d/2), consisting of one- and two-qubit Pauli operators acting on neighboring sites in a one-dimensional lattice. Here, we uncover two critical differences between such set, and equivalent ones for unitary and orthogonal circuits. Namely, we find that the operators in G cannot generate arbitrary local symplectic unitaries and that they are not translationally invariant. We then review the Schur-Weyl duality between the symplectic group and the Brauer algebra, and use tools from Weingarten calculus to prove that Pauli measurements at the output of Haar random symplectic circuits can converge to Gaussian processes. As a by-product, such analysis provides us with concentration bounds for Pauli measurements in circuits that form t-designs over mathbbSP(d/2). To finish, we present tensor-network tools to analyze shallow random symplectic circuits, and we use these to numerically show that computational-basis measurements anti-concentrate at logarithmic depth.
