# Predicting Ship Responses in Different Seaways using a Generalizable Force Correcting Machine Learning Method

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08033 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.08033/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 May 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Port-Hamiltonian Neural Networks for Learning Explicit Time-Dependent Dynamical Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.08024/) (2021)
- [Hybrid Forecasting of Chaotic Processes: Using Machine Learning in Conjunction with a Knowledge-Based Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.04779/) (2018)
- [Physics guided machine learning using simplified theories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.13343/) (2020)
- [Data-Driven System Identification of 6-DoF Ship Motion in Waves with Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.01773/) (2021)
- [A Data Driven Method for Multi-step Prediction of Ship Roll Motion in High Sea States](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.12673/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Analysis, forecasting and system identification of a floating offshore wind turbine using dynamic mode decomposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.07263/) (2024)
- [Model-free system identification of surface ships in waves via Hankel dynamic mode decomposition with control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.15782/) (2025)
- [System Identification of a Moored ASV with Recessed Moon Pool via Deterministic and Bayesian Hankel-DMDc](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.03482/) (2025)
- [Data-driven uncertainty-aware seakeeping prediction of the Delft 372 catamaran using ensemble Hankel dynamic mode decomposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.04461/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

A machine learning (ML) method is generalizable if it can make predictions on inputs which differ from the training dataset. For predictions of wave-induced ship responses, generalizability is an important consideration if ML methods are to be useful in design evaluations. Furthermore, the size of the training dataset has a significant impact on the practicality of a method, especially when training data is generated using high-fidelity numerical tools which are expensive. This paper considers a hybrid machine learning method which corrects the force in a low-fidelity equation of motion. The method is applied to two different case studies: the nonlinear responses of a Duffing equation subject to irregular excitation, and high-fidelity heave and pitch response data of a Fast Displacement Ship (FDS) in head seas. The generalizability of the method is determined in both cases by making predictions of the response in irregular wave conditions that differ from those in the training dataset. The influence that low-fidelity physics-based terms in the hybrid model have on generalizability is also investigated. The predictions are compared to two benchmarks: a linear physics-based model and a data-driven LSTM model. It is found that the hybrid method offers an improvement in prediction accuracy and generalizability when trained on a small dataset.
