# Low-light Object Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.03519 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.03519/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 15 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 May 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.12872/) (2020)
- [Generalized Intersection over Union: A Metric and A Loss for Bounding Box Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.09630/) (2019)
- [Object Detection in 20 Years: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.05055/) (2019)
- [DETRs with Collaborative Hybrid Assignments Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.12860/) (2022)
- [Better Aggregation in Test-Time Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.11156/) (2020)
- [You Only Need 90K Parameters to Adapt Light: A Light Weight Transformer for Image Enhancement and Exposure Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14871/) (2022)
- [Robust Semi-Supervised Learning for Self-learning Open-World Classes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.07551/) (2024)
- [MrTF: Model Refinery for Transductive Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04201/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this competition we employed a model fusion approach to achieve object detection results close to those of real images. Our method is based on the CO-DETR model, which was trained on two sets of data: one containing images under dark conditions and another containing images enhanced with low-light conditions. We used various enhancement techniques on the test data to generate multiple sets of prediction results. Finally, we applied a clustering aggregation method guided by IoU thresholds to select the optimal results.
