# Predicting Open-Hole Laminates Failure Using Support Vector Machines With Classical and Quantum Kernels

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.02903 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.02903/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 5 of its 42 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 May 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.11173/) (2018)
- [The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.08605/) (2020)
- [Training Quantum Embedding Kernels on Near-Term Quantum Computers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.02276/) (2021)
- [Detecting Clouds in Multispectral Satellite Images Using Quantum-Kernel Support Vector Machines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08270/) (2023)
- [Quantum Kernel Alignment with Stochastic Gradient Descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.09899/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Modeling open hole failure of composites is a complex task, consisting in a highly nonlinear response with interacting failure modes. Numerical modeling of this phenomenon has traditionally been based on the finite element method, but requires to tradeoff between high fidelity and computational cost. To mitigate this shortcoming, recent work has leveraged machine learning to predict the strength of open hole composite specimens. Here, we also propose using data-based models but to tackle open hole composite failure from a classification point of view. More specifically, we show how to train surrogate models to learn the ultimate failure envelope of an open hole composite plate under in-plane loading. To achieve this, we solve the classification problem via support vector machine (SVM) and test different classifiers by changing the SVM kernel function. The flexibility of kernel-based SVM also allows us to integrate the recently developed quantum kernels in our algorithm and compare them with the standard radial basis function (RBF) kernel. Finally, thanks to kernel-target alignment optimization, we tune the free parameters of all kernels to best separate safe and failure-inducing loading states. The results show classification accuracies higher than 90% for RBF, especially after alignment, followed closely by the quantum kernel classifiers.