# Machine Learning Data Practices through a Data Curation Lens: An Evaluation Framework

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.02703 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.02703/

## Key facts

- Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 4 May 2024.

## Built on by (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [BetterBench: Assessing AI Benchmarks, Uncovering Issues, and Establishing Best Practices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.12990/) (2024)
- [ECBD: Evidence-Centered Benchmark Design for NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08723/) (2024)
- [Agent Data Protocol: Unifying Datasets for Diverse, Effective Fine-tuning of LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.24702/) (2025)
- [From Points to Coalitions: Hierarchical Contrastive Shapley Values for Prioritizing Data Samples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.19363/) (2025)
- [Benchmark Data Repositories for Better Benchmarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.24100/) (2024)
- [Neglected Risks: The Disturbing Reality of Children's Images in Datasets and the Urgent Call for Accountability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14446/) (2025)
- [Can Generalist Agents Automate Data Curation?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.04261/) (2026)
- [EvalCards: A Framework for Standardized Evaluation Reporting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21695/) (2025)
- [TechOps: Technical Documentation Templates for the AI Act](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.08804/) (2025)
- [AI for Scientific Discovery is a Social Problem](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.06580/) (2025)
- [Explanations as Bias Detectors: A Critical Study of Local Post-hoc XAI Methods for Fairness Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.00802/) (2025)
- [Compliance Rating Scheme: A Data Provenance Framework for Generative AI Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.21775/) (2025)
- [The Consensus Trap: Dissecting Subjectivity and the "Ground Truth" Illusion in Data Annotation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11318/) (2026)
- [From Reflection to Repair: A Scoping Review of Dataset Documentation Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15968/) (2026)
- [A Guide to Failure in Machine Learning: Reliability and Robustness from Foundations to Practice](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.00563/) (2025)
- [Real-time prediction of breast cancer sites using deformation-aware graph neural network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.13082/) (2025)
- [Robust Vision Systems for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles: Security Challenges and Attack Vectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.09740/) (2026)
- [LLJ Cards: Best practices for the Use of LLMs as Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.24516/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Studies of dataset development in machine learning call for greater attention to the data practices that make model development possible and shape its outcomes. Many argue that the adoption of theory and practices from archives and data curation fields can support greater fairness, accountability, transparency, and more ethical machine learning. In response, this paper examines data practices in machine learning dataset development through the lens of data curation. We evaluate data practices in machine learning as data curation practices. To do so, we develop a framework for evaluating machine learning datasets using data curation concepts and principles through a rubric. Through a mixed-methods analysis of evaluation results for 25 ML datasets, we study the feasibility of data curation principles to be adopted for machine learning data work in practice and explore how data curation is currently performed. We find that researchers in machine learning, which often emphasizes model development, struggle to apply standard data curation principles. Our findings illustrate difficulties at the intersection of these fields, such as evaluating dimensions that have shared terms in both fields but non-shared meanings, a high degree of interpretative flexibility in adapting concepts without prescriptive restrictions, obstacles in limiting the depth of data curation expertise needed to apply the rubric, and challenges in scoping the extent of documentation dataset creators are responsible for. We propose ways to address these challenges and develop an overall framework for evaluation that outlines how data curation concepts and methods can inform machine learning data practices.