# Countering Reward Over-optimization in LLM with Demonstration-Guided Reinforcement Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.19409 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.19409/

## Key facts

- Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 40 of its 57 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Reward modeling and RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/reward-modeling-and-rlhf/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 40)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01108/) (2019)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)
- [The Curious Case of Neural Text Degeneration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09751/) (2019)
- [Learning to summarize from human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01325/) (2020)
- [Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.08593/) (2019)
- [WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.09332/) (2021)
- [Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.10760/) (2022)
- [A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12036/) (2023)
- [Scheduled Sampling for Sequence Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.03099/) (2015)
- [OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07327/) (2023)
- [Learning Complex Dexterous Manipulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning and Demonstrations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.10087/) (2017)
- [RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00267/) (2023)
- [Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.06732/) (2015)
- [Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgements](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14375/) (2022)
- [A Deep Reinforced Model for Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.04304/) (2017)
- [Overcoming Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Demonstrations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.10089/) (2017)
- [Is Reinforcement Learning (Not) for Natural Language Processing: Benchmarks, Baselines, and Building Blocks for Natural Language Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01241/) (2022)
- [Rewarded soups: towards Pareto-optimal alignment by interpolating weights fine-tuned on diverse rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04488/) (2023)
- [Deal or No Deal? End-to-End Learning for Negotiation Dialogues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.05125/) (2017)
- [A Study on Overfitting in Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.06893/) (2018)
- [An Actor-Critic Algorithm for Sequence Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.07086/) (2016)
- [WARM: On the Benefits of Weight Averaged Reward Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12187/) (2024)
- [Reinforcement and Imitation Learning for Diverse Visuomotor Skills](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.09564/) (2018)
- [Calibrating Sequence likelihood Improves Conditional Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.00045/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization in Direct Alignment Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.02900/) (2024)
- [Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.16436/) (2024)
- [Correcting the Mythos of KL-Regularization: Direct Alignment without Overoptimization via Chi-Squared Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.13399/) (2024)
- [Robust Preference Optimization through Reward Model Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19316/) (2024)
- [The Perfect Blend: Redefining RLHF with Mixture of Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.20370/) (2024)
- [Understanding the Dark Side of LLMs' Intrinsic Self-Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14959/) (2024)
- [Post-hoc Reward Calibration: A Case Study on Length Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.17407/) (2024)
- [Model Surgery: Modulating LLM's Behavior Via Simple Parameter Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.08770/) (2024)
- [Sail into the Headwind: Alignment via Robust Rewards and Dynamic Labels against Reward Hacking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.09544/) (2024)
- [LASeR: Learning to Adaptively Select Reward Models with Multi-Armed Bandits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.01735/) (2024)
- [PABU: Progress-Aware Belief Update for Efficient LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.09138/) (2026)
- [Proximalized Preference Optimization for Diverse Feedback Types: A Decomposed Perspective on DPO](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23316/) (2025)
- [Supervised Fine-Tuning versus Reinforcement Learning: A Study of Post-Training Methods for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.13985/) (2026)
- [Pause or Fabricate? Training Language Models for Grounded Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.19656/) (2026)
- [When Can Proxies Improve the Sample Complexity of Preference Learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.16475/) (2024)
- [LLM-Driven Self-Refinement for Embodied Drone Task Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.15501/) (2025)
- [MEMETRON: Metaheuristic Mechanisms for Test-time Response Optimization of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.08643/) (2025)
- [EAPO: Enhancing Policy Optimization with On-Demand Expert Assistance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.23730/) (2025)
- [Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Regret Optimization for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00155/) (2026)
- [Efficient Exploration for Iterative Nash Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.01382/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While Reinforcement Learning (RL) has been proven essential for tuning large language models (LLMs), it can lead to reward over-optimization (ROO). Existing approaches address ROO by adding KL regularization, requiring computationally expensive hyperparameter tuning. Additionally, KL regularization focuses solely on regularizing the language policy, neglecting a potential source of regularization: the reward function itself. Inspired by demonstration-guided RL, we here introduce the Reward Calibration from Demonstration (RCfD), which leverages human demonstrations and a reward model to recalibrate the reward objective. Formally, given a prompt, the RCfD objective minimizes the distance between the demonstrations' and LLM's rewards rather than directly maximizing the reward function. This objective shift avoids incentivizing the LLM to exploit the reward model and promotes more natural and diverse language generation. We show the effectiveness of RCfD on three language tasks, which achieves comparable performance to carefully tuned baselines while mitigating ROO.
