# PKU-AIGIQA-4K: A Perceptual Quality Assessment Database for Both Text-to-Image and Image-to-Image AI-Generated Images

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18409 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18409/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 37 of its 50 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 37)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0575/) (2014)
- [Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.06125/) (2022)
- [Adding Conditional Control to Text-to-Image Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.05543/) (2023)
- [Going Deeper with Convolutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.4842/) (2014)
- [GLIDE: Towards Photorealistic Image Generation and Editing with Text-Guided Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10741/) (2021)
- [CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08718/) (2021)
- [Improved Training of Wasserstein GANs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.00028/) (2017)
- [Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.07261/) (2016)
- [MANIQA: Multi-dimension Attention Network for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.08958/) (2022)
- [Blind Image Quality Assessment Using A Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.02665/) (2019)
- [Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.01697/) (2016)
- [One Transformer Fits All Distributions in Multi-Modal Diffusion at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.06555/) (2023)
- [RankIQA: Learning from Rankings for No-reference Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.08347/) (2017)
- [MetaIQA: Deep Meta-learning for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05508/) (2020)
- [AGIQA-3K: An Open Database for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04717/) (2023)
- [LAFITE: Towards Language-Free Training for Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.13792/) (2021)
- [Perceptual Quality Prediction on Authentically Distorted Images Using a Bag of Features Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.04757/) (2016)
- [Toward Verifiable and Reproducible Human Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01816/) (2023)
- [AIGCIQA2023: A Large-scale Image Quality Assessment Database for AI Generated Images: from the Perspectives of Quality, Authenticity and Correspondence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.00211/) (2023)
- [Attentions Help CNNs See Better: Attention-based Hybrid Image Quality Assessment Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.10485/) (2022)
- [A Perceptual Quality Assessment Exploration for AIGC Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12618/) (2023)
- [Norm-in-Norm Loss with Faster Convergence and Better Performance for Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.03889/) (2020)
- [Perceptual Image Quality Assessment with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14730/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, image generation technology has rapidly advanced, resulting in the creation of a vast array of AI-generated images (AIGIs). However, the quality of these AIGIs is highly inconsistent, with low-quality AIGIs severely impairing the visual experience of users. Due to the widespread application of AIGIs, the AI-generated image quality assessment (AIGIQA), aimed at evaluating the quality of AIGIs from the perspective of human perception, has garnered increasing interest among scholars. Nonetheless, current research has not yet fully explored this field. We have observed that existing databases are limited to images generated from single scenario settings. Databases such as AGIQA-1K, AGIQA-3K, and AIGCIQA2023, for example, only include images generated by text-to-image generative models. This oversight highlights a critical gap in the current research landscape, underscoring the need for dedicated databases catering to image-to-image scenarios, as well as more comprehensive databases that encompass a broader range of AI-generated image scenarios. Addressing these issues, we have established a large scale perceptual quality assessment database for both text-to-image and image-to-image AIGIs, named PKU-AIGIQA-4K. We then conduct a well-organized subjective experiment to collect quality labels for AIGIs and perform a comprehensive analysis of the PKU-AIGIQA-4K database. Regarding the use of image prompts during the training process, we propose three image quality assessment (IQA) methods based on pre-trained models that include a no-reference method NR-AIGCIQA, a full-reference method FR-AIGCIQA, and a partial-reference method PR-AIGCIQA. Finally, leveraging the PKU-AIGIQA-4K database, we conduct extensive benchmark experiments and compare the performance of the proposed methods and the current IQA methods.