# Membership Information Leakage in Federated Contrastive Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16850 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16850/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Federated unlearning and poisoning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 25 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Federated unlearning and poisoning](https://mlsanity.com/safety/federated-unlearning-and-poisoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.05709/) (2020)
- [Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.03748/) (2018)
- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.05722/) (2019)
- [Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07733/) (2020)
- [Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.05820/) (2016)
- [Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discrimination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.01978/) (2018)
- [Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.07728/) (2018)
- [Context Encoders: Feature Learning by Inpainting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.07379/) (2016)
- [Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations by Solving Jigsaw Puzzles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.09246/) (2016)
- [Colorful Image Colorization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.08511/) (2016)
- [Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning by Context Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.05192/) (2015)
- [Self-Supervised Learning of Pretext-Invariant Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01991/) (2019)
- [Model-Contrastive Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.16257/) (2021)
- [The Future of Digital Health with Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.08119/) (2020)
- [Time-Contrastive Networks: Self-Supervised Learning from Video](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.06888/) (2017)
- [Federated Unsupervised Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.08982/) (2020)
- [EncoderMI: Membership Inference against Pre-trained Encoders in Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.11023/) (2021)
- [Divergence-aware Federated Self-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.04385/) (2022)
- [Collaborative Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.06492/) (2021)
- [Federated Self-Supervised Learning of Multi-Sensor Representations for Embedded Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.13018/) (2020)
- [Federated Contrastive Learning for Decentralized Unlabeled Medical Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07504/) (2021)
- [Federated Contrastive Learning for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.10983/) (2022)
- [Lightweight machine unlearning in neural network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.05528/) (2021)
- [BAGEL: Backdoor Attacks against Federated Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16113/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Contrastive Learning (FCL) represents a burgeoning approach for learning from decentralized unlabeled data while upholding data privacy. In FCL, participant clients collaborate in learning a global encoder using unlabeled data, which can serve as a versatile feature extractor for diverse downstream tasks. Nonetheless, FCL is susceptible to privacy risks, such as membership information leakage, stemming from its distributed nature, an aspect often overlooked in current solutions. This study delves into the feasibility of executing a membership inference attack on FCL and proposes a robust attack methodology. The attacker's objective is to determine if the data signifies training member data by accessing the model's inference output. Specifically, we concentrate on attackers situated within a client framework, lacking the capability to manipulate server-side aggregation methods or discern the training status of other clients. We introduce two membership inference attacks tailored for FCL: the textitpassive membership inference attack and the textitactive membership inference attack, contingent on the attacker's involvement in local model training. Experimental findings across diverse datasets validate the effectiveness of our attacks and underscore the inherent privacy risks associated with the federated contrastive learning paradigm.
