# Towards a Holistic Evaluation of LLMs on Factual Knowledge Recall

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16164 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16164/

## Key facts

- Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05250/) (2016)
- [TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.03551/) (2017)
- [Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03629/) (2022)
- [BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.05100/) (2022)
- [Language Models as Knowledge Bases?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01066/) (2019)
- [Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08207/) (2021)
- [Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.12837/) (2022)
- [Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10625/) (2022)
- [When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10511/) (2022)
- [How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08910/) (2020)
- [How Context Affects Language Models' Factual Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.04611/) (2020)
- [Head-to-Tail: How Knowledgeable are Large Language Models (LLMs)? A.K.A. Will LLMs Replace Knowledge Graphs?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10168/) (2023)
- [What In-Context Learning "Learns" In-Context: Disentangling Task Recognition and Task Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.09731/) (2023)
- [Ground-Truth Labels Matter: A Deeper Look into Input-Label Demonstrations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12685/) (2022)
- [KoLA: Carefully Benchmarking World Knowledge of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09296/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Conformal Linguistic Calibration: Trading-off between Factuality and Specificity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19110/) (2025)
- [Core: Robust Factual Precision with Informative Sub-Claim Identification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.03572/) (2024)
- [See or Recall: A Sanity Check for the Role of Vision in Solving Visualization Question Answer Tasks with Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.09809/) (2025)
- [ExAnte: A Benchmark for Ex-Ante Inference in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19533/) (2025)
- [Reinforcement Learning Improves Traversal of Parametric Knowledge in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.05933/) (2025)
- [From Memorization to Generalization: Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Biomedical Term-to-Identifier Normalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.19036/) (2025)
- [Predictable Confabulations: Factual Recall by LLMs Scales with Model Size and Topic Frequency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.18732/) (2026)
- [Knowledge Distillation During Mid-Training Favors Reasoning over Factual Recall](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.01532/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance on a variety of NLP tasks, and are being rapidly adopted in a wide range of use cases. It is therefore of vital importance to holistically evaluate the factuality of their generated outputs, as hallucinations remain a challenging issue. In this work, we focus on assessing LLMs' ability to recall factual knowledge learned from pretraining, and the factors that affect this ability. To that end, we construct FACT-BENCH, a representative benchmark covering 20 domains, 134 property types, 3 answer types, and different knowledge popularity levels. We benchmark 31 models from 10 model families and provide a holistic assessment of their strengths and weaknesses. We observe that instruction-tuning hurts knowledge recall, as pretraining-only models consistently outperform their instruction-tuned counterparts, and positive effects of model scaling, as larger models outperform smaller ones for all model families. However, the best performance from GPT-4 still represents a large gap with the upper-bound. We additionally study the role of in-context exemplars using counterfactual demonstrations, which lead to significant degradation of factual knowledge recall for large models. By further decoupling model known and unknown knowledge, we find the degradation is attributed to exemplars that contradict a model's known knowledge, as well as the number of such exemplars. Lastly, we fine-tune LLaMA-7B in different settings of known and unknown knowledge. In particular, fine-tuning on a model's known knowledge is beneficial, and consistently outperforms fine-tuning on unknown and mixed knowledge. We will make our benchmark publicly available.