# Reinforcement of Explainability of ChatGPT Prompts by Embedding Breast Cancer Self-Screening Rules into AI Responses

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.14454 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14454/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.13586/) (2021)
- [Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.13138/) (2022)
- [Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08786/) (2021)
- [Do Prompt-Based Models Really Understand the Meaning of their Prompts?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01247/) (2021)
- [Are Large Language Models Ready for Healthcare? A Comparative Study on Clinical Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05368/) (2023)
- [Integrating Physiological Time Series and Clinical Notes with Transformer for Early Prediction of Sepsis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.14469/) (2022)
- [No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Using Space-Time Chips](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.00031/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [From Knowledge Generation to Knowledge Verification: Examining the BioMedical Generative Capabilities of ChatGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14714/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Addressing the global challenge of breast cancer, this research explores the fusion of generative AI, focusing on ChatGPT 3.5 turbo model, and the intricacies of breast cancer risk assessment. The research aims to evaluate ChatGPT's reasoning capabilities, emphasizing its potential to process rules and provide explanations for screening recommendations. The study seeks to bridge the technology gap between intelligent machines and clinicians by demonstrating ChatGPT's unique proficiency in natural language reasoning. The methodology employs a supervised prompt-engineering approach to enforce detailed explanations for ChatGPT's recommendations. Synthetic use cases, generated algorithmically, serve as the testing ground for the encoded rules, evaluating the model's processing prowess. Findings highlight ChatGPT's promising capacity in processing rules comparable to Expert System Shells, with a focus on natural language reasoning. The research introduces the concept of reinforcement explainability, showcasing its potential in elucidating outcomes and facilitating user-friendly interfaces for breast cancer risk assessment.