# Exploring Boundaries and Intensities in Offensive and Hate Speech: Unveiling the Complex Spectrum of Social Media Discourse

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.12042 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12042/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 52 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02116/) (2019)
- [Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04009/) (2017)
- [HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.10289/) (2020)
- [Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12516/) (2019)
- [Adapting Pre-trained Language Models to African Languages via Multilingual Adaptive Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.06487/) (2022)
- [Multilingual and Multi-Aspect Hate Speech Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.11049/) (2019)
- [Contextualizing Hate Speech Classifiers with Post-hoc Explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.02439/) (2020)
- [Offensive Language and Hate Speech Detection for Danish](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.04531/) (2019)
- [AfroLM: A Self-Active Learning-based Multilingual Pretrained Language Model for 23 African Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.03263/) (2022)
- [Confronting Abusive Language Online: A Survey from the Ethical and Human Rights Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.12305/) (2020)
- [Introducing various Semantic Models for Amharic: Experimentation and Evaluation with multiple Tasks and Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.01154/) (2020)
- [A Legal Approach to Hate Speech: Operationalizing the EU's Legal Framework against the Expression of Hatred as an NLP Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.03422/) (2020)
- [AbuseAnalyzer: Abuse Detection, Severity and Target Prediction for Gab Posts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.00038/) (2020)
- [Analysis of the Ethiopic Twitter Dataset for Abusive Speech in Amharic](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04419/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [AfriHate: A Multilingual Collection of Hate Speech and Abusive Language Datasets for African Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.08284/) (2025)
- [HatePRISM: Policies, Platforms, and Research Integration. Advancing NLP for Hate Speech Proactive Mitigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.04350/) (2025)
- [Demarked: A Strategy for Enhanced Abusive Speech Moderation through Counterspeech, Detoxification, and Message Management](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.19543/) (2024)
- [Hate Speech Detection in Turkish and Arabic: A Comprehensive Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.00143/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The prevalence of digital media and evolving sociopolitical dynamics have significantly amplified the dissemination of hateful content. Existing studies mainly focus on classifying texts into binary categories, often overlooking the continuous spectrum of offensiveness and hatefulness inherent in the text. In this research, we present an extensive benchmark dataset for Amharic, comprising 8,258 tweets annotated for three distinct tasks: category classification, identification of hate targets, and rating offensiveness and hatefulness intensities. Our study highlights that a considerable majority of tweets belong to the less offensive and less hate intensity levels, underscoring the need for early interventions by stakeholders. The prevalence of ethnic and political hatred targets, with significant overlaps in our dataset, emphasizes the complex relationships within Ethiopia's sociopolitical landscape. We build classification and regression models and investigate the efficacy of models in handling these tasks. Our results reveal that hate and offensive speech can not be addressed by a simplistic binary classification, instead manifesting as variables across a continuous range of values. The Afro-XLMR-large model exhibits the best performances achieving F1-scores of 75.30%, 70.59%, and 29.42% for the category, target, and regression tasks, respectively. The 80.22% correlation coefficient of the Afro-XLMR-large model indicates strong alignments.