# Challenging Negative Gender Stereotypes: A Study on the Effectiveness of Automated Counter-Stereotypes

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.11845 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.11845/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [A Benchmark Dataset for Learning to Intervene in Online Hate Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.04251/) (2019)
- [CONAN -- COunter NArratives through Nichesourcing: a Multilingual Dataset of Responses to Fight Online Hate Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03270/) (2019)
- [Thou shalt not hate: Countering Online Hate Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.04409/) (2018)
- [Generating Counter Narratives against Online Hate Speech: Data and Strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04216/) (2020)
- [Handling and Presenting Harmful Text in NLP Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.14256/) (2022)
- [Generate, Prune, Select: A Pipeline for Counterspeech Generation against Online Hate Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01625/) (2021)
- [Towards Countering Essentialism through Social Bias Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16173/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Defining Cultural Capabilities for AI Evaluation: A Taxonomy Grounded in Intercultural Communication Theory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.15990/) (2026)
- [Tackling Social Bias against the Poor: A Dataset and Taxonomy on Aporophobia](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13085/) (2025)
- [Deconstructing Stereotypes: Scope-Conditioned Generation for Effective Multilingual Counterspeech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.16906/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Gender stereotypes are pervasive beliefs about individuals based on their gender that play a significant role in shaping societal attitudes, behaviours, and even opportunities. Recognizing the negative implications of gender stereotypes, particularly in online communications, this study investigates eleven strategies to automatically counter-act and challenge these views. We present AI-generated gender-based counter-stereotypes to (self-identified) male and female study participants and ask them to assess their offensiveness, plausibility, and potential effectiveness. The strategies of counter-facts and broadening universals (i.e., stating that anyone can have a trait regardless of group membership) emerged as the most robust approaches, while humour, perspective-taking, counter-examples, and empathy for the speaker were perceived as less effective. Also, the differences in ratings were more pronounced for stereotypes about the different targets than between the genders of the raters. Alarmingly, many AI-generated counter-stereotypes were perceived as offensive and/or implausible. Our analysis and the collected dataset offer foundational insight into counter-stereotype generation, guiding future efforts to develop strategies that effectively challenge gender stereotypes in online interactions.
