# Beyond One-Size-Fits-All: Adapting Counterfactual Explanations to User Objectives

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.08721 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.08721/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 20 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6572/) (2014)
- [Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.07269/) (2017)
- [Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00399/) (2017)
- [FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.09369/) (2019)
- [Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.10596/) (2020)
- [A survey of algorithmic recourse: definitions, formulations, solutions, and prospects](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.04050/) (2020)
- [Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning: Challenges Revisited](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.07756/) (2021)
- [Choose your Data Wisely: A Framework for Semantic Counterfactuals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17667/) (2023)
- [Counterfactuals of Counterfactuals: a back-translation-inspired approach to analyse counterfactual editors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17055/) (2023)
- [Computing Rule-Based Explanations of Machine Learning Classifiers using Knowledge Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03971/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has emerged as a critical area of research aimed at enhancing the transparency and interpretability of AI systems. Counterfactual Explanations (CFEs) offer valuable insights into the decision-making processes of machine learning algorithms by exploring alternative scenarios where certain factors differ. Despite the growing popularity of CFEs in the XAI community, existing literature often overlooks the diverse needs and objectives of users across different applications and domains, leading to a lack of tailored explanations that adequately address the different use cases. In this paper, we advocate for a nuanced understanding of CFEs, recognizing the variability in desired properties based on user objectives and target applications. We identify three primary user objectives and explore the desired characteristics of CFEs in each case. By addressing these differences, we aim to design more effective and tailored explanations that meet the specific needs of users, thereby enhancing collaboration with AI systems.