# LLM Agents can Autonomously Exploit One-day Vulnerabilities

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.08144 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.08144/

## Key facts

- Cited by 128 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 29 of its 53 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Agent threats, guardrails and governance](https://mlsanity.com/agents/agent-threats-guardrails-and-governance/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 29 of 29)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [Mistral 7B](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06825/) (2023)
- [Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15043/) (2023)
- [Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07682/) (2022)
- [Mixtral of Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04088/) (2024)
- [Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12173/) (2023)
- [Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03693/) (2023)
- [ChemCrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05376/) (2023)
- [InjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02691/) (2024)
- [Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.15004/) (2023)
- [Augmented Language Models: a Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07842/) (2023)
- [Shadow Alignment: The Ease of Subverting Safely-Aligned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02949/) (2023)
- [Exploiting Programmatic Behavior of LLMs: Dual-Use Through Standard Security Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.05733/) (2023)
- [Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14197/) (2023)
- [OpenChat: Advancing Open-source Language Models with Mixed-Quality Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.11235/) (2023)
- [Removing RLHF Protections in GPT-4 via Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05553/) (2023)
- [Emergent autonomous scientific research capabilities of large language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05332/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Frontier Models for Dangerous Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13793/) (2024)
- [Automated Vulnerability Detection in Source Code Using Deep Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.04320/) (2018)
- [Getting pwn'd by AI: Penetration Testing with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00121/) (2023)
- [TDAG: A Multi-Agent Framework based on Dynamic Task Decomposition and Agent Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10178/) (2024)
- [Will AI Make Cyber Swords or Shields: A few mathematical models of technological progress](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.13825/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 128)

- [Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.21504/) (2025)
- [The Emerged Security and Privacy of LLM Agent: A Survey with Case Studies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.19354/) (2024)
- [A Comprehensive Survey in LLM(-Agent) Full Stack Safety: Data, Training and Deployment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.15585/) (2025)
- [CVE-Bench: A Benchmark for AI Agents' Ability to Exploit Real-World Web Application Vulnerabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.17332/) (2025)
- [Teams of LLM Agents can Exploit Zero-Day Vulnerabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01637/) (2024)
- [From LLMs to LLM-based Agents for Software Engineering: A Survey of Current, Challenges and Future](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.02479/) (2024)
- [When LLMs Meet Cybersecurity: A Systematic Literature Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.03644/) (2024)
- [CYBERSECEVAL 3: Advancing the Evaluation of Cybersecurity Risks and Capabilities in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.01605/) (2024)
- [LLMs in Software Security: A Survey of Vulnerability Detection Techniques and Insights](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.07049/) (2025)
- [Infrastructure for AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.10114/) (2025)
- [VulnBot: Autonomous Penetration Testing for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.13411/) (2025)
- [Unsafer in Many Turns: Benchmarking and Defending Multi-Turn Safety Risks in Tool-Using Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.13379/) (2026)
- [Agentic AI Security: Threats, Defenses, Evaluation, and Open Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.23883/) (2025)
- [Why Are Web AI Agents More Vulnerable Than Standalone LLMs? A Security Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.20383/) (2025)
- [Large Model Based Agents: State-of-the-Art, Cooperation Paradigms, Security and Privacy, and Future Trends](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.14457/) (2024)
- [When LLMs Go Online: The Emerging Threat of Web-Enabled LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14569/) (2024)
- [Frontier AI's Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05408/) (2025)
- [A Survey on Agentic Security: Applications, Threats and Defenses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.06445/) (2025)
- [Estimating Worst-Case Frontier Risks of Open-Weight LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03153/) (2025)
- [On the Limitations of Compute Thresholds as a Governance Strategy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.05694/) (2024)
- [Audit-LLM: Multi-Agent Collaboration for Log-based Insider Threat Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08902/) (2024)
- [Defending Against Social Engineering Attacks in the Age of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12263/) (2024)
- [Comparing AI Agents to Cybersecurity Professionals in Real-World Penetration Testing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.09882/) (2025)
- [SECURE: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Cybersecurity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20441/) (2024)
- [CTINexus: Automatic Cyber Threat Intelligence Knowledge Graph Construction Using Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21060/) (2024)
- [Benchmarking Practices in LLM-driven Offensive Security: Testbeds, Metrics, and Experiment Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10112/) (2025)
- [Personalized Attacks of Social Engineering in Multi-turn Conversations: LLM Agents for Simulation and Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.15552/) (2025)
- [OCCULT: Evaluating Large Language Models for Offensive Cyber Operation Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.15797/) (2025)
- [FaultLine: Automated Proof-of-Vulnerability Generation Using LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.15241/) (2025)
- [Towards Automated Penetration Testing: Introducing LLM Benchmark, Analysis, and Improvements](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17141/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

LLMs have becoming increasingly powerful, both in their benign and malicious uses. With the increase in capabilities, researchers have been increasingly interested in their ability to exploit cybersecurity vulnerabilities. In particular, recent work has conducted preliminary studies on the ability of LLM agents to autonomously hack websites. However, these studies are limited to simple vulnerabilities. In this work, we show that LLM agents can autonomously exploit one-day vulnerabilities in real-world systems. To show this, we collected a dataset of 15 one-day vulnerabilities that include ones categorized as critical severity in the CVE description. When given the CVE description, GPT-4 is capable of exploiting 87% of these vulnerabilities compared to 0% for every other model we test (GPT-3.5, open-source LLMs) and open-source vulnerability scanners (ZAP and Metasploit). Fortunately, our GPT-4 agent requires the CVE description for high performance: without the description, GPT-4 can exploit only 7% of the vulnerabilities. Our findings raise questions around the widespread deployment of highly capable LLM agents.