# Dealing with Subject Similarity in Differential Morphing Attack Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.07667 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07667/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Going Deeper with Convolutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.4842/) (2014)
- [Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGAN](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04958/) (2019)
- [FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clustering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.03832/) (2015)
- [VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and age](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.08092/) (2017)
- [Joint Face Detection and Alignment using Multi-task Cascaded Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.02878/) (2016)
- [MS-Celeb-1M: A Dataset and Benchmark for Large-Scale Face Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.08221/) (2016)
- [MagFace: A Universal Representation for Face Recognition and Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.06627/) (2021)
- [Improved Residual Networks for Image and Video Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04989/) (2020)
- [Deep Face Representations for Differential Morphing Attack Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.01202/) (2020)
- [Morphing Attack Detection -- Database, Evaluation Platform and Benchmarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.06458/) (2020)
- [Are GAN-based Morphs Threatening Face Recognition?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.02496/) (2022)
- [SFace: Sigmoid-Constrained Hypersphere Loss for Robust Face Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12010/) (2022)
- [Robust Morph-Detection at Automated Border Control Gate using Deep Decomposed 3D Shape and Diffuse Reflectance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01372/) (2019)
- [Differential Morph Face Detection using Discriminative Wavelet Sub-bands](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.13178/) (2021)
- [Reliable Face Morphing Attack Detection in On-The-Fly Border Control Scenario with Variation in Image Resolution and Capture Distance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.15474/) (2022)
- [Towards minimizing efforts for Morphing Attacks -- Deep embeddings for morphing pair selection and improved Morphing Attack Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18216/) (2023)
- [Fused Classification For Differential Face Morphing Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00665/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [SFDemorpher: Generalizable Face Demorphing for Operational Morphing Attack Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.28322/) (2026)
- [Face Re-morphing: Differential Morphing Attack Detection via Feature-Space Similarity Changes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.13858/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The advent of morphing attacks has posed significant security concerns for automated Face Recognition systems, raising the pressing need for robust and effective Morphing Attack Detection (MAD) methods able to effectively address this issue. In this paper, we focus on Differential MAD (D-MAD), where a trusted live capture, usually representing the criminal, is compared with the document image to classify it as morphed or bona fide. We show these approaches based on identity features are effective when the morphed image and the live one are sufficiently diverse; unfortunately, the effectiveness is significantly reduced when the same approaches are applied to look-alike subjects or in all those cases when the similarity between the two compared images is high (e.g. comparison between the morphed image and the accomplice). Therefore, in this paper, we propose ACIdA, a modular D-MAD system, consisting of a module for the attempt type classification, and two modules for the identity and artifacts analysis on input images. Successfully addressing this task would allow broadening the D-MAD applications including, for instance, the document enrollment stage, which currently relies entirely on human evaluation, thus limiting the possibility of releasing ID documents with manipulated images, as well as the automated gates to detect both accomplices and criminals. An extensive cross-dataset experimental evaluation conducted on the introduced scenario shows that ACIdA achieves state-of-the-art results, outperforming literature competitors, while maintaining good performance in traditional D-MAD benchmarks.
