# How much reliable is ChatGPT's prediction on Information Extraction under Input Perturbations?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.05088 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05088/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 34 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 34)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.13461/) (2019)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.12837/) (2022)
- [Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.13255/) (2020)
- [Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to Train Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, A Large-Scale Generative Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11990/) (2022)
- [How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.07597/) (2023)
- [Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.07998/) (2021)
- [Explain Yourself! Leveraging Language Models for Commonsense Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02361/) (2019)
- [Toxicity in ChatGPT: Analyzing Persona-assigned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05335/) (2023)
- [On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11001/) (2019)
- [Evaluating Verifiability in Generative Search Engines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.09848/) (2023)
- [ChatIE: Zero-Shot Information Extraction via Chatting with ChatGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.10205/) (2023)
- [Adversarial GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark for Robustness Evaluation of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.02840/) (2021)
- [Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? Yes With GPT-4 As The Engine](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.08745/) (2023)
- [Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07736/) (2023)
- [Towards Making the Most of ChatGPT for Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13780/) (2023)
- [Measure and Improve Robustness in NLP Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08313/) (2021)
- [ChatGPT Makes Medicine Easy to Swallow: An Exploratory Case Study on Simplified Radiology Reports](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.14882/) (2022)
- [Is ChatGPT a Good Sentiment Analyzer? A Preliminary Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.04339/) (2023)
- [InfoBERT: Improving Robustness of Language Models from An Information Theoretic Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02329/) (2020)
- [A Short Survey of Viewing Large Language Models in Legal Aspect](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.09136/) (2023)
- [Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of Plagiarism Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04335/) (2023)
- ["I think this is the most disruptive technology": Exploring Sentiments of ChatGPT Early Adopters using Twitter Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.05856/) (2022)
- [TriggerNER: Learning with Entity Triggers as Explanations for Named Entity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07493/) (2020)
- [RockNER: A Simple Method to Create Adversarial Examples for Evaluating the Robustness of Named Entity Recognition Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05620/) (2021)
- [Exploring Predictive Uncertainty and Calibration in NLP: A Study on the Impact of Method & Data Scarcity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.15452/) (2022)
- [Robust Named Entity Recognition with Truecasing Pretraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.07095/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we assess the robustness (reliability) of ChatGPT under input perturbations for one of the most fundamental tasks of Information Extraction (IE) i.e. Named Entity Recognition (NER). Despite the hype, the majority of the researchers have vouched for its language understanding and generation capabilities; a little attention has been paid to understand its robustness: How the input-perturbations affect 1) the predictions, 2) the confidence of predictions and 3) the quality of rationale behind its prediction. We perform a systematic analysis of ChatGPT's robustness (under both zero-shot and few-shot setup) on two NER datasets using both automatic and human evaluation. Based on automatic evaluation metrics, we find that 1) ChatGPT is more brittle on Drug or Disease replacements (rare entities) compared to the perturbations on widely known Person or Location entities, 2) the quality of explanations for the same entity considerably differ under different types of "Entity-Specific" and "Context-Specific" perturbations and the quality can be significantly improved using in-context learning, and 3) it is overconfident for majority of the incorrect predictions, and hence it could lead to misguidance of the end-users.