# ROPO: Robust Preference Optimization for Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.04102 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04102/

## Key facts

- Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 50 of its 64 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [LLM preference optimization methods](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/llm-preference-optimization-methods/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 50)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Mistral 7B](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06825/) (2023)
- [Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12712/) (2023)
- [Learning to summarize from human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01325/) (2020)
- [Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.08593/) (2019)
- [Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.07836/) (2018)
- [A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12036/) (2023)
- [Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15217/) (2023)
- [Instruction Tuning with GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03277/) (2023)
- [RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06767/) (2023)
- [Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.09050/) (2018)
- [MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.05055/) (2017)
- [RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00267/) (2023)
- [Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.08199/) (2020)
- [Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01335/) (2024)
- [Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.07075/) (2021)
- [Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14486/) (2022)
- [Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.06112/) (2019)
- [RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tears](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05302/) (2023)
- [Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.09482/) (2017)
- [Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.10795/) (2020)
- [Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00151/) (2020)
- [SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10425/) (2023)
- [Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01693/) (2023)
- [Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11456/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Genius: A Generalizable and Purely Unsupervised Self-Training Framework For Advanced Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.08672/) (2025)
- [Sail into the Headwind: Alignment via Robust Rewards and Dynamic Labels against Reward Hacking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.09544/) (2024)
- [Doubly Robust Alignment for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.01183/) (2025)
- [VRPO: Rethinking Value Modeling for Robust RL under Noisy Supervision in LLM Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03058/) (2025)
- [Reward Auditor: Inference on Reward Modeling Suitability in Real-World Perturbed Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.00920/) (2025)
- [Two Minds Better Than One: Collaborative Reward Modeling for LLM Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.10597/) (2025)
- [Aligning Visual Contrastive learning models via Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.08923/) (2024)
- [Scalable Valuation of Human Feedback through Provably Robust Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17859/) (2025)
- [RE-PO: Robust Enhanced Policy Optimization as a General Framework for LLM Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.24159/) (2025)
- [Semiparametric Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Single-Index Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.21917/) (2025)
- [A-IPO: Adaptive Intent-driven Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.10077/) (2025)
- [A Jointly Efficient and Optimal Algorithm for Heteroskedastic Generalized Linear Bandits with Adversarial Corruptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.10971/) (2026)
- [Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learning from Multi-Source Imperfect Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.20453/) (2026)
- [Metadata-Free Meta-Reweighted Direct Preference Optimization under Noisy Preference Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.09796/) (2026)
- [Positive-Unlabeled Preference Optimization For Chest X-ray Report Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.05341/) (2026)
- [Disentangling Optimization Scale from Preference Scale in DPO](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.27032/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Preference alignment is pivotal for empowering large language models (LLMs) to generate helpful and harmless responses. However, the performance of preference alignment is highly sensitive to the prevalent noise in the preference data. Recent efforts for this problem either marginally alleviate the impact of noise without the ability to actually reduce its presence, or rely on costly teacher LLMs prone to reward misgeneralization. To address these challenges, we propose the RObust Preference Optimization (ROPO) framework, an iterative alignment approach that integrates noise-tolerance and filtering of noisy samples without the aid of external models. Specifically, ROPO iteratively solves a constrained optimization problem, where we dynamically assign a quality-aware weight for each sample and constrain the sum of the weights to the number of samples we intend to retain. For noise-tolerant training and effective noise identification, we derive a robust loss by suppressing the gradients of samples with high uncertainty. We demonstrate both empirically and theoretically that the derived loss is critical for distinguishing noisy samples from clean ones. Furthermore, inspired by our derived loss, we propose a robustness-guided rejection sampling technique to compensate for the potential important information in discarded queries. Experiments on three widely-used datasets with Mistral-7B and Llama-2-7B demonstrate that ROPO significantly outperforms existing preference alignment methods, with its superiority growing as the noise rate increases.