# Federated Unlearning for Human Activity Recognition

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03659 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.03659/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Federated unlearning and poisoning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 9 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Federated unlearning and poisoning](https://mlsanity.com/safety/federated-unlearning-and-poisoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.05820/) (2016)
- [Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.05492/) (2016)
- [The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08232/) (2018)
- [Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.04933/) (2019)
- [ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.01246/) (2018)
- [Federated Unlearning: How to Efficiently Erase a Client in FL?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05521/) (2022)
- [Federated Unlearning with Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.09441/) (2022)
- [Meta-HAR: Federated Representation Learning for Human Activity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.00615/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [A Survey on Federated Unlearning: Challenges and Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02437/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid evolution of Internet of Things (IoT) technology has spurred the widespread adoption of Human Activity Recognition (HAR) in various daily life domains. Federated Learning (FL) is frequently utilized to build a global HAR model by aggregating user contributions without transmitting raw individual data. Despite substantial progress in user privacy protection with FL, challenges persist. Regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) empower users to request data removal, raising a new query in FL: How can a HAR client request data removal without compromising other clients' privacy? In response, we propose a lightweight machine unlearning method for refining the FL HAR model by selectively removing a portion of a client's training data. Our method employs a third-party dataset unrelated to model training. Using KL divergence as a loss function for fine-tuning, we aim to align the predicted probability distribution on forgotten data with the third-party dataset. Additionally, we introduce a membership inference evaluation method to assess unlearning effectiveness. Experimental results across diverse datasets show our method achieves unlearning accuracy comparable to textitretraining methods, resulting in speedups ranging from hundreds to thousands.