# CAM-Based Methods Can See through Walls

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01964 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01964/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 25 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12092/) (2021)
- [Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.01852/) (2015)
- [CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.04899/) (2019)
- [Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.04150/) (2015)
- [Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6034/) (2013)
- [Sanity Checks for Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.03292/) (2018)
- [Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.11063/) (2017)
- [A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-Parameterization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.03962/) (2018)
- [Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.06720/) (2019)
- [Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01279/) (2019)
- [Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.03804/) (2018)
- [Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragile](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10547/) (2017)
- [The (Un)reliability of saliency methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00867/) (2017)
- [A Survey on Neural Network Interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.14261/) (2020)
- [Axiom-based Grad-CAM: Towards Accurate Visualization and Explanation of CNNs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.02312/) (2020)
- [Fooling Neural Network Interpretations via Adversarial Model Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.02041/) (2019)
- [On the Convergence Rate of Training Recurrent Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.12065/) (2018)
- [Use HiResCAM instead of Grad-CAM for faithful explanations of convolutional neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.08891/) (2020)
- [Opti-CAM: Optimizing saliency maps for interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.07002/) (2023)
- [What does LIME really see in images?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.06307/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Linearly-Interpretable Concept Embedding Models for Text Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.14335/) (2024)
- [Birds look like cars: Adversarial analysis of intrinsically interpretable deep learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.08636/) (2025)
- [Attribution Upsampling should Redistribute, Not Interpolate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.16067/) (2026)
- [Evidential Rule Learning for Interpretable Classification with Abstention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.05859/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

CAM-based methods are widely-used post-hoc interpretability method that produce a saliency map to explain the decision of an image classification model. The saliency map highlights the important areas of the image relevant to the prediction. In this paper, we show that most of these methods can incorrectly attribute an important score to parts of the image that the model cannot see. We show that this phenomenon occurs both theoretically and experimentally. On the theory side, we analyze the behavior of GradCAM on a simple masked CNN model at initialization. Experimentally, we train a VGG-like model constrained to not use the lower part of the image and nevertheless observe positive scores in the unseen part of the image. This behavior is evaluated quantitatively on two new datasets. We believe that this is problematic, potentially leading to mis-interpretation of the model's behavior.