# Beyond Accuracy: Evaluating the Reasoning Behavior of Large Language Models -- A Survey

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01869 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01869/

## Key facts

- Cited by 83 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 69 of its 116 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-benchmarks-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 69)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.13461/) (2019)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15556/) (2022)
- [Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12712/) (2023)
- [Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10045/) (2019)
- [Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00093/) (2023)
- [Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10403/) (2022)
- [Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18654/) (2023)
- [The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.12288/) (2023)
- [Augmented Language Models: a Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07842/) (2023)
- [Language Models Are Greedy Reasoners: A Systematic Formal Analysis of Chain-of-Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01240/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00157/) (2024)
- [Reasoning with Language Model Prompting: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09597/) (2022)
- [Reasoning or Reciting? Exploring the Capabilities and Limitations of Language Models Through Counterfactual Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.02477/) (2023)
- [Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03927/) (2024)
- [Inverse Scaling: When Bigger Isn't Better](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09479/) (2023)
- [Evaluating the Logical Reasoning Ability of ChatGPT and GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03439/) (2023)
- [Navigate through Enigmatic Labyrinth A Survey of Chain of Thought Reasoning: Advances, Frontiers and Future](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15402/) (2023)
- [Embers of Autoregression: Understanding Large Language Models Through the Problem They are Trained to Solve](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13638/) (2023)
- [ROSCOE: A Suite of Metrics for Scoring Step-by-Step Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07919/) (2022)
- [Talking About Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.03551/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 83)

- [Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09567/) (2025)
- [Multi-Step Reasoning with Large Language Models, a Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.11511/) (2024)
- [Can Language Models Learn to Skip Steps?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.01855/) (2024)
- [Internal Consistency and Self-Feedback in Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.14507/) (2024)
- [A Survey of Large Language Model Agents for Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19213/) (2025)
- [Foundation Models in Autonomous Driving: A Survey on Scenario Generation and Scenario Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.11526/) (2025)
- [Unveiling Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models: Reality or Mirage?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.21215/) (2025)
- [AI Safety in Generative AI Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18369/) (2024)
- [Generative to Agentic AI: Survey, Conceptualization, and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.18875/) (2025)
- [MINERVA: Evaluating Complex Video Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.00681/) (2025)
- [Evaluating the Robustness of Analogical Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.14215/) (2024)
- [The Open Proof Corpus: A Large-Scale Study of LLM-Generated Mathematical Proofs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.21621/) (2025)
- [TS-Reasoner: Domain-Oriented Time Series Inference Agents for Reasoning and Automated Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04047/) (2024)
- [The Scales of Justitia: A Comprehensive Survey on Safety Evaluation of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.11094/) (2025)
- [100 instances is all you need: predicting the success of a new LLM on unseen data by testing on a few instances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.03563/) (2024)
- [FlairGPT: Repurposing LLMs for Interior Designs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.04648/) (2025)
- [iLLM-TSC: Integration reinforcement learning and large language model for traffic signal control policy improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.06025/) (2024)
- [DetectiveQA: Evaluating Long-Context Reasoning on Detective Novels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.02465/) (2024)
- [Auditing Meta-Cognitive Hallucinations in Reasoning Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13143/) (2025)
- [Reasoning on a Spectrum: Aligning LLMs to System 1 and System 2 Thinking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12470/) (2025)
- [Uncovering Latent Chain of Thought Vectors in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.14026/) (2024)
- [Reasoning-as-Logic-Units: Scaling Test-Time Reasoning in Large Language Models Through Logic Unit Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.07803/) (2025)
- [How to Train a Leader: Hierarchical Reasoning in Multi-Agent LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.08960/) (2025)
- [AgenticPay: A Multi-Agent LLM Negotiation System for Buyer-Seller Transactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06008/) (2026)
- [Investigating the Shortcomings of LLMs in Step-by-Step Legal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05675/) (2025)
- [A Desideratum for Conversational Agents: Capabilities, Challenges, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16939/) (2025)
- [ReasonBENCH: Benchmarking the (In)Stability of LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.07795/) (2025)
- [Advancing General-Purpose Reasoning Models with Modular Gradient Surgery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02301/) (2026)
- [PuzzleWorld: A Benchmark for Multimodal, Open-Ended Reasoning in Puzzlehunts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.06211/) (2025)
- [Mechanistic Indicators of Understanding in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.08017/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have recently shown impressive performance on tasks involving reasoning, leading to a lively debate on whether these models possess reasoning capabilities similar to humans. However, despite these successes, the depth of LLMs' reasoning abilities remains uncertain. This uncertainty partly stems from the predominant focus on task performance, measured through shallow accuracy metrics, rather than a thorough investigation of the models' reasoning behavior. This paper seeks to address this gap by providing a comprehensive review of studies that go beyond task accuracy, offering deeper insights into the models' reasoning processes. Furthermore, we survey prevalent methodologies to evaluate the reasoning behavior of LLMs, emphasizing current trends and efforts towards more nuanced reasoning analyses. Our review suggests that LLMs tend to rely on surface-level patterns and correlations in their training data, rather than on sophisticated reasoning abilities. Additionally, we identify the need for further research that delineates the key differences between human and LLM-based reasoning. Through this survey, we aim to shed light on the complex reasoning processes within LLMs.